Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

386
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
386
Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

15.4K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
15.4K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

704
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
704
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

368
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
368

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Overview of the linking exercise for advancing daily stress (LEADS) management and resilience randomized controlled trial in African American families.

Contemporary clinical trials·2026
Same author

Baseline Characteristics and Social Challenges of Children with Sickle Cell Disease in Haiti and after Immigration to the United States: A Comparative Cohort Study.

Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities·2026
Same author

Measuring General Health Literacy in Haitian Immigrant Adults: Validation of the HLS<sub>19</sub>-Q12 Instrument in Haitian Creole.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2026
Same author

Factors That Contribute to the Contextual Adaptation of Communities That Care for Romania: A Thematic Key Informant Analysis.

Journal of prevention (2022)·2026
Same author

The causal impact of older siblings' academic achievement on younger siblings' risk for drug use disorder: instrumental variable and propensity score analyses.

Psychological medicine·2026
Same author

Addressing Suicide and Mental Health Through Universal Childhood Intervention: Results from The Seattle Social Development Project.

Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research·2025
Same journal

Bayesian Machine Learning Tools for Alcohol Use Disorder Research: The bpaup R Package.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

A Unified Framework for Jointly modelling Response Times and Item Position Effects in Computer-Based Learning Assessments.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

Generalizability Theory Applied to Daily Relationship Quality: Substantive and Statistical Directions.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

A Modularized Higher-Order Diagnostic Classification Model for Clustered Attribute Hierarchies.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

Generalizing Causal Effects to a Target Population Without Individual-Level Data from the Target Population.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

betaselectr: Selective (and Proper) Standardization in Structural Equation Models.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 27, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.5K

Using Multilevel Mixtures to Evaluate Intervention Effects in Group Randomized Trials.

M Lee Van Horn1, Abigail A Fagan2, Thomas Jaki3

  • 1a Department of Psychology , University of South Carolina .

Multivariate Behavioral Research
|January 15, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Finite mixture models can assess if behavioral interventions impact specific individuals. This method helps understand intervention effectiveness for diverse populations and problem behaviors.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy
07:20

Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy

Published on: August 9, 2024

2.1K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 27, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.5K
Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy
07:20

Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy

Published on: August 9, 2024

2.1K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Psychology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Behavioral intervention effectiveness can vary significantly across different individuals.
  • Current methods for evaluating these differential outcomes are underdeveloped.
  • Understanding subgroup impacts is crucial for optimizing intervention strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose finite mixture models for evaluating intervention effects in specific participant subgroups.
  • To assess whether interventions, particularly in group randomized trials, yield differential impacts based on participant characteristics or problem behavior levels.
  • To demonstrate the application of these models using a preventive intervention targeting problem behaviors.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized finite mixture models with latent classes derived from clustering individuals based on targeted behaviors.
  • Employed a multilevel mixture model incorporating random effects to analyze intervention impacts.
  • Illustrated model application through an example evaluating a preventive intervention's effect on illicit substance users versus other problematic substance users.

Main Results:

  • Demonstrated the identification and independent validation of latent classes within the population.
  • Showcased the specification of random effects in multilevel mixture models.
  • Illustrated the estimation of statistical power for detecting intervention effects within identified latent classes.

Conclusions:

  • Finite mixture models provide a robust framework for evaluating heterogeneous intervention effects.
  • The proposed methodology allows for nuanced understanding of how interventions impact distinct subgroups.
  • This approach can be broadly applied to assess the effectiveness of various interventions across diverse populations.