Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

18.1K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
18.1K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

17.2K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
17.2K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Pay attention to clinical research, diagnosis and treatment of mixed cognitive impairment].

Zhonghua yi xue za zhi·2022
Same author

[Gastric peripheral T-cell lymphoma-not otherwise specified with CD20 and CD79α aberrant expression: report of a case].

Zhonghua bing li xue za zhi = Chinese journal of pathology·2022
Same author

[Morphological and histopathological evaluation of temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis induced by perforation of articular disc in rats].

Zhonghua kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Zhonghua kouqiang yixue zazhi = Chinese journal of stomatology·2021
Same author

Improvement of the Irrigation Scheme in the ORCHIDEE Land Surface Model and Impacts of Irrigation on Regional Water Budgets Over China.

Journal of advances in modeling earth systems·2020
Same author

[Value of liver transplantation in treatment of angiosarcoma: a report of 2 cases].

Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology·2017
Same author

[Report of two cases of newly occurred angiosarcoma after liver transplantation].

Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese journal of oncology]·2016
Same journal

Bayesian Machine Learning Tools for Alcohol Use Disorder Research: The bpaup R Package.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

A Unified Framework for Jointly modelling Response Times and Item Position Effects in Computer-Based Learning Assessments.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

Generalizability Theory Applied to Daily Relationship Quality: Substantive and Statistical Directions.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

A Modularized Higher-Order Diagnostic Classification Model for Clustered Attribute Hierarchies.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

Generalizing Causal Effects to a Target Population Without Individual-Level Data from the Target Population.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

betaselectr: Selective (and Proper) Standardization in Structural Equation Models.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 27, 2026

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

8.5K

Generalizability Of Free-Recall Measurements.

S S Peng, S D Farr

    Multivariate Behavioral Research
    |January 15, 2016
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study found that free-recall measurement generalizability improves with subject experience and summary trials. Experienced fifth-graders showed better recall consistency across different word list lengths and presentation rates.

    More Related Videos

    A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test
    09:13

    A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test

    Published on: May 16, 2017

    12.2K
    The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
    07:26

    The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

    Published on: January 31, 2017

    40.6K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 27, 2026

    Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
    07:59

    Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

    Published on: June 14, 2019

    8.5K
    A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test
    09:13

    A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test

    Published on: May 16, 2017

    12.2K
    The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
    07:26

    The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

    Published on: January 31, 2017

    40.6K

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Educational Psychology
    • Psychometrics

    Background:

    • Assessing the reliability of memory recall tests is crucial for educational and psychological research.
    • Understanding factors influencing the generalizability of free-recall measures is essential for accurate assessment.
    • Previous research has explored various parameters affecting memory performance, but generalizability across conditions needs further investigation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the generalizability of free-recall measurements in fifth-grade pupils.
    • To determine the impact of list length, presentation rate, and subject experience on recall consistency.
    • To evaluate the effectiveness of summary trials in enhancing measurement generalizability.

    Main Methods:

    • Fifty-five fifth-grade students participated in the study.
    • Participants completed ten trials of recalling familiar nouns, along with two summary trials.
    • Experimental conditions varied list lengths (20 and 30 words) and presentation rates (1.5 and 2.25 seconds per word) across two occasions, two weeks apart.
    • Alpha factor analysis was employed to assess generalizability and domain homogeneity.

    Main Results:

    • Alpha factor analysis indicated that the measurement procedures could be considered as originating from a single domain.
    • The homogeneity of this domain was estimated at .64 for experienced subjects.
    • Generalizability of free-recall measurements was found to be greater for experienced subjects.
    • The inclusion of a summary trial significantly increased the generalizability of the measurement procedure.

    Conclusions:

    • Free-recall measurements can be generalized across different conditions, particularly with experienced subjects.
    • Summary trials offer a practical method for improving the reliability and generalizability of recall assessments.
    • The findings provide valuable insights for designing and interpreting memory recall studies in educational settings.