Quality, evolution, and clinical implications of randomized, controlled trials on the treatment of lung cancer. A

A Nicolucci1, R Grilli, A A Alexanian

  • 1Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, S Maria Imbaro (Chieti), Italy.

JAMA
|October 20, 1989
PubMed

Insights

Methodological flaws in lung cancer trials, including handling withdrawals and sample size, hinder progress. Despite some improvements, inconsistent quality and lack of clear efficacy data limit the value of meta-analysis for lung cancer treatment research.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are crucial for advancing lung cancer treatment.
  • Previous reviews suggest methodological limitations in published lung cancer trials.
  • Assessing the quality of evidence is essential for guiding clinical practice and future research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the methodological quality of published randomized trials in lung cancer treatment.
  • To identify specific areas of concern in trial design, execution, and reporting.
  • To assess the evolution of trial quality over time and its impact on the reliability of findings.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and critical appraisal of 150 published randomized trials on lung cancer treatment.
  • Assessment of methodological aspects including handling of withdrawals, sample size estimation, randomization procedures, and reporting of eligible nonrandomized patients.
  • Analysis of trends in trial quality over time and differences between non-small-cell lung cancer and small-cell lung cancer.

Main Results:

  • Significant methodological drawbacks were identified in the majority of reviewed trials.
  • Key areas of concern included inadequate handling of withdrawals (only 7/150 trials), unspecified sample size calculations (only 9/150), unsatisfactory randomization blinding (only 22/150), and imprecise reporting of eligible nonrandomized patients (only 13/150).
  • While some improvements in design and reporting were observed over time, the evolution was inconsistent, particularly for non-small-cell lung cancer where untreated control arms were abandoned despite lack of proven efficacy.

Conclusions:

  • The methodological quality of lung cancer randomized trials remains a significant concern, limiting the reliability of their findings.
  • Inconsistent trial quality and the abandonment of untreated control arms in non-small-cell lung cancer highlight challenges in establishing effective treatments.
  • The heterogeneity and methodological limitations of existing trials make quantitative meta-analysis unlikely to be constructive for defining optimal lung cancer care.

Related Concept Videos

Cancer Therapies02:49

Cancer Therapies

Cancer therapies are various modes of treatment, such as surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy that are administered to cancer patients.
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Targeted Cancer Therapies02:57

Targeted Cancer Therapies

The targeted cancer therapies, also known as “molecular targeted therapies,” take advantage of the molecular and genetic differences between the cancer cells and the normal cells. It needs a thorough understanding of the cancer cells to develop drugs that can target specific molecular aspects that drive the growth, progression, and spread of cancer cells without affecting the growth and survival of other normal cells in the body.
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Cancer Survival Analysis01:21

Cancer Survival Analysis

Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...