Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

697
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
697
Hazard Rate01:11

Hazard Rate

487
The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...
487
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

703
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
703
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

522
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
522
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

2.5K
Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genetically predicted serum urate and cancer risk: a Mendelian randomization study.

Scandinavian journal of rheumatology·2025
Same author

Utility of zero echo time (ZTE) sequence for assessing bony lesions of skull base and calvarium.

Clinical radiology·2024
Same author

Faecal microbiota transplantation for patients with irritable bowel syndrome: abridged secondary publication.

Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi·2024
Same author

Reproducibility of T<sub>1ρ</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> quantification in a multi-vendor multi-site study.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2022
Same author

Characterizing export of land-based microplastics to the estuary - Part II: Sensitivity analysis of an integrated geospatial microplastic transport modeling assessment of tire and road wear particles.

The Science of the total environment·2018
Same author

Characterizing export of land-based microplastics to the estuary - Part I: Application of integrated geospatial microplastic transport models to assess tire and road wear particles in the Seine watershed.

The Science of the total environment·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 27, 2026

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC
11:38

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC

Published on: May 10, 2016

12.8K

A comparative evaluation of five hazard screening tools.

J M Panko1, K Hitchcock1, M Fung2

  • 1Cardno ChemRisk, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management
|January 19, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Hazard assessment tools vary widely in their scoring of chemical safety. This pilot study shows significant differences in how tools classify chemical hazards, emphasizing the need for careful selection and transparency.

Keywords:
Alternatives assessmentGreener chemicalsHazard assessmentTool comparison“Safer” products

More Related Videos

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
16:02

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation

Published on: February 10, 2023

3.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 27, 2026

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC
11:38

High Content Screening Analysis to Evaluate the Toxicological Effects of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents HPHC

Published on: May 10, 2016

12.8K
Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation
16:02

Demonstration of the Sequence Alignment to Predict Across Species Susceptibility Tool for Rapid Assessment of Protein Conservation

Published on: February 10, 2023

3.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Toxicology
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Growing use of hazard assessment tools for product differentiation and green claims.
  • Retailer policies increasingly require chemical hazard disclosure using specific tools.
  • Lack of data on the reliability and consistency of these screening tools.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare hazard scoring consistency across different chemical screening tools.
  • To determine if chemical hazard and toxicity profiles differ between tools.
  • To assess the reliability of tools for informing greener product selection.

Main Methods:

  • Pilot study involving seven diverse chemicals (natural and man-made).
  • Assessments conducted following individual tool provider guidelines (endpoints, weighting, data sources).
  • Comparison of hazard scores and classifications generated by multiple tools.

Main Results:

  • Significant variation in hazard scoring discrimination among the tools for the tested chemicals.
  • Wide discrepancies in chemical hazard classifications, ranging from low to very high.
  • Identified need for greater transparency in the methodologies and data used by hazard tools.

Conclusions:

  • Hazard assessment tools are not universally applicable and exhibit context-specific evaluations.
  • The choice of a hazard assessment tool must align with a clearly defined assessment rationale.
  • Emphasizes the importance of understanding tool limitations and enhancing transparency for credible hazard scoring.