Identification of fungal pathogens in Formalin-fixed, Paraffin-embedded tissue samples by molecular methods

Volker Rickerts1

  • 1Robert Koch Institut, FG 16, Nordufer 20, 13353 Berlin, Germany.

Fungal Biology
|January 20, 2016
PubMed

Insights

Molecular methods like PCR and in situ hybridization improve fungal pathogen identification from tissue samples. However, inconsistent reporting of controls hinders direct comparison of studies on invasive fungal infections (IFI).

Area of Science:

  • Medical Mycology
  • Molecular Diagnostics
  • Infectious Diseases

Background:

  • Invasive fungal infections (IFI) etiology is poorly understood due to limitations in traditional diagnostic methods like cultures and histopathology.
  • Diagnostic gaps hinder optimal antifungal use and contribute to adverse patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate molecular methods, specifically PCR and in situ hybridization, for identifying fungal pathogens in Formalin-fixed, Paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue.
  • To highlight the challenges and limitations in current molecular diagnostic approaches for IFI.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized PCR assays (species-specific and broad-range) on FFPE samples from patients with proven IFI.
  • Reviewed studies employing in situ hybridization for fungal identification in clinical samples.
  • Assessed the impact of various factors on diagnostic sensitivity, including sample types, target sequences, and probe chemistry.

Main Results:

  • Fungal species identification rates using PCR on FFPE samples ranged from 15-90%, with significant heterogeneity.
  • Comparison across studies is difficult due to inconsistent reporting of controls for false positives, false negatives, and PCR inhibition.
  • In situ hybridization studies also showed variability in sample types, targeted fungi, and detection methods.

Conclusions:

  • Molecular methods offer an alternative for fungal pathogen identification from FFPE tissues, but diagnostic sensitivity varies.
  • Standardized reporting of controls is crucial for comparing and validating molecular diagnostic studies for IFI.
  • Parallel use of PCR and in situ hybridization may provide additive insights and a better understanding of fungal etiology, while acknowledging the limitations of each approach.