Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

[Comparative study on various methods currently used in anal manometry].

J A Carmona Sáez, H Ortiz Hurtado, I Pérez Cabañas

Revista Espanola De Las Enfermedades Del Aparato Digestivo

|July 1, 1989

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

[Cutaneous metastases of rectal cancer].

Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra·2014

Same author

Open fracture of a cervical transverse process as a result of a bull-horn wound.

Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra·2012

Same author

[Lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage caused by jejunal leiomyoblastoma].

Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas·1991

Same author

[Gastric lipoma: an infrequent cause of upper digestive hemorrhage].

Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas·1990

Same author

[Hemangiopericytoma of the rectal mesentery].

Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas·1990

Same author

[The limits of normality tables for anthropometric parameters].

Nutricion hospitalaria·1989

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Different systems for measuring anal canal pressure show similar results, but rectal sensitivity is affected by infusion speed. Continuous infusion allows for a greater maximum tolerated volume compared to rapid boluses.

Area of Science:

Gastroenterology
Physiology
Medical Devices

Background:

Accurate measurement of anal canal pressure is crucial for diagnosing anorectal disorders.
Existing methods, including open and closed perfusion probes and microtransducers, have varying reliability.
Rectal sensitivity to distention is an important factor in assessing anorectal function.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare the measurements obtained from different systems used for anal canal pressure characterization.
To evaluate the exactness and reliability of these techniques in assessing rectal sensitivity to distention.
To review and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of various measurement methods.

Main Methods:

Comparison of measurements from an open perfusion probe, a closed perfusion probe, and a microtransducer.

Related Experiment Videos

Assessment of rectal sensitivity to distention using different infusion rates (continuous vs. bolus).

Review of existing literature on anorectal manometry techniques.

Main Results:

Measurements obtained with different systems showed variations with catheter diameter, but differences were not statistically significant.
Maximum tolerated rectal volume was significantly greater with slow, continuous saline infusion compared to rapid bolus infusion.
The study highlights the impact of infusion methodology on rectal sensitivity assessments.

Conclusions:

While different manometry systems demonstrate comparable pressure measurements, the method of rectal distention significantly influences patient tolerance.
Continuous infusion techniques are more reliable for assessing maximum tolerated rectal volumes.
Understanding these methodological differences is key for accurate anorectal function evaluation.