Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Covariance analysis in generalized linear measurement error models.

R J Carroll1

  • 1Department of Statistics, Texas A & M University, College Station 77843.

Statistics in Medicine
|September 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fine structure in the <math></math>  decay of <math></math> Hg and <math></math> Au.

The European physical journal. A, Hadrons and nuclei·2025
Same author

Competition between Allowed and First-Forbidden β Decay: The Case of ^{208}Hg→^{208}Tl.

Physical review letters·2020
Same author

Phenome-wide association study identifies dsDNA as a driver of major organ involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Lupus·2018
Same author

Representing Knowledge Consistently Across Health Systems.

Yearbook of medical informatics·2017
Same author

94 β-Decay Half-Lives of Neutron-Rich _{55}Cs to _{67}Ho: Experimental Feedback and Evaluation of the r-Process Rare-Earth Peak Formation.

Physical review letters·2017
Same author

Estimation of radiation risk in presence of classical additive and Berkson multiplicative errors in exposure doses.

Biostatistics (Oxford, England)·2016
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Beyond Fixed Thresholds: Optimizing Summaries of Wearable Device Data via Piecewise Linearization of Quantile Functions.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Causal Framework for Evaluating the Total Effect of Strategies Aiming to Expand Screening and to Improve Outcomes.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Causal Effects on Nonterminal Event Time With Application to Antibiotic Usage and Future Resistance.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study examines errors-in-variables in generalized linear models, focusing on treatment effect estimation. Ignoring measurement error in non-randomized studies can lead to incorrect conclusions about treatment effects.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Econometrics

Background:

  • The errors-in-variables problem is crucial in generalized linear models, particularly for covariance analysis and treatment effect estimation.
  • Significant differences exist in testing for treatment effects between randomized and non-randomized study models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent advancements in addressing the errors-in-variables problem within generalized linear models.
  • To highlight the challenges and methods for testing and estimating treatment effects, especially concerning measurement error.

Main Methods:

  • Focus on covariance analysis techniques for generalized linear models.
  • Comparison of methods for treatment effect estimation in randomized versus non-randomized studies.
  • Discussion of the impact of measurement error on statistical inference.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Simple methods are available for treatment effect testing in randomized studies.
  • Estimating treatment effects in logistic regression requires careful handling of measurement error.
  • Ignoring measurement error in non-randomized studies can reverse true findings.

Conclusions:

  • Accurate modeling of measurement error is essential for reliable treatment effect estimation.
  • The distinction between randomized and non-randomized study designs is critical when addressing errors-in-variables.
  • Careful consideration of measurement error is necessary to avoid erroneous conclusions in statistical analyses.