Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

71.6K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
71.6K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

274.9K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
274.9K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

67.1K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
67.1K
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

734
Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
734
Diversity in Cell Signaling Responses01:22

Diversity in Cell Signaling Responses

8.4K
The physiological function of a cell and cellular communication are outcomes of a range of extrinsic signals, intracellular signaling pathways, and cellular responses. No two cell types express the same repertoire of signaling components. Receptors are highly selective for their cognate ligands, but once activated, they can alter multiple cellular processes such as DNA transcription, protein synthesis, and metabolic activity. 
Graded and Abrupt Responses
Some signaling systems generate...
8.4K
Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

39.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
39.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A cognitive profile of body dysmorphic disorder: an investigation using the WAIS-IV.

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS·2026
Same author

Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies: power calculations in clinical trials.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2026
Same author

The Silexan in the Treatment Of Posttraumatic stress disorder (STOP) trial: protocol for a 12-week randomised controlled trial of adjunctive Silexan for PTSD.

BMC complementary medicine and therapies·2026
Same author

Could master protocols be adapted for effectiveness-implementation hybrid studies?

BMC medical research methodology·2025
Same author

Psilocybin with psychotherapeutic support for treatment-resistant depression: a pilot clinical trial.

Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology·2025
Same author

Psilocybin-assisted psychotherapy for depression and anxiety associated with life threatening illness: A phase 2b randomized controlled trial.

General hospital psychiatry·2025
Same journal

Shared intentionality and attachment theories in WILD and WEIRD contexts.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Constructing an architecture for a decolonized developmental science.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Go WILD, but mind the gap.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

WILDing the study of developmental trajectories in navigation and wayfinding: Progress and challenges.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

WILD kids, cutting-edge research. Enhancing diversity and reflexivity in psychology.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same journal

Ethnographic methods can help psychology overcome its WEIRD problems.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 26, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K

Diverse crowds using diverse methods improves the scientific dialectic.

Matt Motyl1, Ravi Iyer1

  • 1Department of Psychology,University of Illinois at Chicago,Chicago,IL 60607.motyl@uic.eduravi@civilpolitics.orghttp://motyl.people.uic.edu/www.polipsych.com.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|January 21, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Scientific progress thrives on diversity. This study argues for increased political, religious, and methodological diversity in social psychology, asserting that greater diversity enhances scientific knowledge development.

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K
Author Spotlight: Collective Behavioral Analysis of the Nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans
03:32

Author Spotlight: Collective Behavioral Analysis of the Nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 26, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.9K
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.4K
Author Spotlight: Collective Behavioral Analysis of the Nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans
03:32

Author Spotlight: Collective Behavioral Analysis of the Nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.5K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Scientific Methodology

Background:

  • Diversity is crucial for advancing scientific knowledge.
  • Previous work highlighted the need for political diversity in social psychology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for broader diversity within social psychology.
  • To emphasize the importance of religious and methodological diversity in addition to political diversity.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis and argumentation.
  • Review of existing literature on diversity in science.

Main Results:

  • Social psychology would benefit from increased political diversity.
  • Religious and methodological diversity are also essential for scientific advancement.

Conclusions:

  • Greater diversity across multiple dimensions (political, religious, methodological) is beneficial for scientific innovation.
  • The principle of 'more diversity is better' applies to scientific research, particularly in social psychology.