Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

15.5K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
15.5K
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test01:02

Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test

4.5K
Sometimes, a data set can have a recorded numerical observation that greatly  deviates from the rest of the data. Assuming that the data is normally distributed, a statistical method called the Grubbs test can be used to determine whether the observation is truly an outlier.  To perform a two-tailed Grubbs test, first, calculate the absolute difference between the outlier and the mean. Then, calculate the ratio between this difference and the standard deviation of the sample. This...
4.5K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

6.9K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
6.9K
Sampling Plans01:23

Sampling Plans

1.3K
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
1.3K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.4K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.4K
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

2.5K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Effects of Within-group Covariance Structure on Recovery in Cluster Analysis: I. The Bivariate Case.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Hypnosis and smoking: a review of the literature.

The American journal of clinical hypnosis·1971
Same author

A consideration of Taulbee and Sisson's "configurational analysis of MMPI profiles of psychiatric groups".

Journal of clinical psychology·1962
Same journal

Bayesian Machine Learning Tools for Alcohol Use Disorder Research: The bpaup R Package.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

A Unified Framework for Jointly modelling Response Times and Item Position Effects in Computer-Based Learning Assessments.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

Generalizability Theory Applied to Daily Relationship Quality: Substantive and Statistical Directions.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

A Modularized Higher-Order Diagnostic Classification Model for Clustered Attribute Hierarchies.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

Generalizing Causal Effects to a Target Population Without Individual-Level Data from the Target Population.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
Same journal

betaselectr: Selective (and Proper) Standardization in Structural Equation Models.

Multivariate behavioral research·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
12:27

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

7.4K

Univariate Screening Measures for Cluster Analysis.

J R Donoghue

    Multivariate Behavioral Research
    |January 21, 2016
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Screening variables using moment-based statistics like m or bimodality (b) improves cluster analysis subgroup recovery. Kurtosis-based screening is not recommended, but m or b screening performs comparably to ultrametric weights.

    More Related Videos

    Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
    06:35

    Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

    Published on: July 24, 2010

    17.4K
    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
    07:35

    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

    Published on: October 11, 2018

    8.1K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 26, 2026

    Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations
    12:27

    Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

    Published on: February 15, 2017

    7.4K
    Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
    06:35

    Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

    Published on: July 24, 2010

    17.4K
    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
    07:35

    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

    Published on: October 11, 2018

    8.1K

    Area of Science:

    • Statistics
    • Data Mining
    • Machine Learning

    Background:

    • Irrelevant variables negatively impact cluster analysis subgroup recovery.
    • Variable screening methods are crucial for enhancing clustering performance.
    • Moment-based statistics offer potential for effective variable selection.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate moment-based statistics for screening variables prior to cluster analysis.
    • To compare the efficacy of different screening methods against no selection and established procedures.
    • To identify optimal variable screening strategies for improved subgroup recovery in clustering.

    Main Methods:

    • Analytical examination of normal mixtures for kurtosis properties.
    • Evaluation of moment-based statistics: m and coefficient of bimodality (b).
    • Monte Carlo simulation comparing screening measures, ultrametric weights, and forward selection.

    Main Results:

    • Screening based on kurtosis degraded subgroup recovery and is not advised.
    • Screening using m or b significantly improved recovery compared to no selection and forward selection.
    • Screening on m or b performed comparably to ultrametric weights; combined screening excelled.

    Conclusions:

    • Variable screening using moment-based statistics (m or b) is a viable alternative to ultrametric weights and forward selection.
    • Kurtosis is not a suitable criterion for variable screening in this context.
    • Effective variable screening enhances the reliability of cluster analysis subgroup recovery.