Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

522
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
522
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

4.2K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
4.2K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

1.5K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.5K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

5.4K
Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
5.4K
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

10.3K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
10.3K
Standards of Care II01:19

Standards of Care II

1.2K
Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Football-Specific On-Pitch Concussion Assessment Protocol-International Consensus Recommendations.

JAMA neurology·2026
Same author

Mucoactive agents in bronchiectasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society·2026
Same author

Low concentration atropine eye drops and progression of myopia in children: multicentre placebo controlled, double masked, randomised trial in the UK (CHAMP-UK).

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026
Same author

Carbocisteine or Hypertonic Saline for Acute Respiratory Failure.

The New England journal of medicine·2026
Same author

Randomised controlled feasibility trial of an intervention to increase activity and reduce sedentary behaviour in people with severe mental illness: Walking fOR Health (WORtH) study.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Concordance between automated/semi-automated measurement and manual assessment of mammographic breast density in individuals undergoing breast cancer screening: A systematic review.

Journal of medical screening·2026
Same journal

Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for post-stroke depression: protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

Outcomes in offspring of interventions to treat substance use in pregnancy: protocol for an umbrella review.

Systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

Association of inflammatory fluid biomarkers with the progression of Alzheimer's disease: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

Environmental moderators of neighbourhood socioeconomic inequalities in mental health: a systematic review protocol.

Systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

Defining interstitial lung disease related to idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a systematic review protocol of the Myositis Clinical Trial Consortium (MCTC).

Systematic reviews·2026
Same journal

Sexual and reproductive health information needs of young adults with chronic conditions: a scoping review protocol.

Systematic reviews·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K

Core outcome sets and systematic reviews.

Mike Clarke1, Paula R Williamson2

  • 1Northern Ireland Network for Trials Methodology Research, Centre for Public Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Block B, Queen's University Belfast, Royal Hospitals, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, BT12 6BJ, UK. m.clarke@qub.ac.uk.

Systematic Reviews
|January 22, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Systematic reviews face challenges due to inconsistent outcome reporting. Greater involvement of systematic reviewers in developing core outcome sets can improve evidence synthesis and health decision-making.

More Related Videos

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

21.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K
Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies
10:38

Observational Study Protocol for Repeated Clinical Examination and Critical Care Ultrasonography Within the Simple Intensive Care Studies

Published on: January 16, 2019

21.0K

Area of Science:

  • Health Research Methodology
  • Evidence Synthesis
  • Clinical Trial Design

Background:

  • Systematic reviews aim to synthesize research evidence but are often hindered by inconsistent outcome measurement and reporting across studies.
  • This inconsistency complicates the interpretation of findings and limits the utility of reviews for informing health and social care decisions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for increased engagement of systematic reviewers in the development and implementation of core outcome sets.
  • To highlight how core outcome sets can enhance the quality and usability of systematic reviews.

Main Methods:

  • This commentary discusses the challenges in systematic reviews stemming from outcome heterogeneity.
  • It proposes the integration of core outcome sets as a standardized approach to outcome measurement and reporting.
  • The authors emphasize the role of systematic reviewers in core outcome set development and application.

Main Results:

  • Standardized outcome sets facilitate more consistent evidence synthesis in systematic reviews.
  • Involvement of reviewers in core outcome set development can improve the selection of outcomes for 'Summary of Findings' tables.
  • Considering core outcome sets during review registration (e.g., with Cochrane Review Groups or PROSPERO) aids review planning.

Conclusions:

  • Greater adoption of core outcome sets in research, including systematic reviews, is crucial for improving health and social care.
  • Systematic reviewers' active participation in core outcome set development and implementation can enhance the reliability and applicability of synthesized evidence.
  • This collaboration ultimately contributes to better health and well-being outcomes.