Active surveillance cultures: comparison of inguinal and rectal sites for detection of multidrug-resistant bacteria
C J N Stier1, M C Paganini1, H H M de Souza2
1Infection Control Committee, Hospital de Clínicas, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, PR, Brazil; Nursing Department and Post-Graduate Nursing Program, Federal University of Paraná (UFPR), Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Background:
Rectal swabs are the most widely used surveillance technique for detecting multidrug-resistant bacteria colonizing the intestinal tract. Obtaining these samples may cause embarrassment and discomfort to patients. Prior studies indicate that perirectal swabs are as sensitive and specific as rectal swabs with greater patient acceptance.
Aim:
To compare inguinal and rectal swabs for the detection of multidrug-resistant bacteria colonizing the intestinal tract.
Methods:
An epidemiological, comparative, prospective, and controlled study was undertaken with 102 Brazilian patients. Inguinal and rectal swabs were collected for culture and compared.
Findings:
Compared to rectal swabs, the sensitivity and specificity of inguinal swabs was 91.8% and 88.7%, respectively. Even when there were low colony counts from rectal samples, there were more than 100 colonies from inguinal samples.
Conclusion:
The inguinal region can be considered an acceptable alternative for collecting surveillance cultures for multidrug-resistant bacteria colonizing the intestinal tract. The inguinal swab technique is sensitive and specific for assessing multidrug-resistant micro-organisms, less embarrassing for patients, and simple to implement in hospital practice.
More Related Videos
09:50Detection of Tissue-resident Bacteria in Bladder Biopsies by 16S rRNA Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Published on: October 18, 2019
04:56Detection of Helicobacter pylori Infection and Antibiotic Resistance via Stool Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis
Published on: May 16, 2025