Reporting on Outcome Measures of Functional Constipation in Children-A Systematic Review

Sophie Kuizenga-Wessel1, Sascha L Heckert, Willemijn Tros

  • 1*Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Center †Medical library, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Insights

Inconsistent definitions and outcome measures in pediatric functional constipation (FC) trials hinder treatment comparisons. Standardized definitions and validated instruments are crucial for reliable research in childhood FC.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Gastroenterology
  • Clinical Trial Methodology
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Standardized outcome measures are essential for comparing clinical trial results.
  • This facilitates the identification of the most effective therapeutic interventions.
  • Functional constipation (FC) is a common condition in children requiring effective treatments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically assess definitions and outcome measures in therapeutic randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for childhood functional constipation (FC).
  • To identify inconsistencies and heterogeneity in current research practices.
  • To provide recommendations for improving future research in this field.

Main Methods:

  • Searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for therapeutic RCTs on childhood FC.
  • Included studies involving children aged 1-18 with FC, providing an FC definition, and published in English.
  • Utilized the Delphi list for quality assessment of included studies.

Main Results:

  • Analyzed 45 studies, revealing 22 different definitions of FC and 29 definitions of treatment success.
  • Seventeen studies used Rome III criteria for FC definition; 27 interventions were investigated.
  • Most trials (80%) used parental diaries, with only 2 validating their instruments; 53% were of good methodological quality.

Conclusions:

  • Significant inconsistency and heterogeneity exist in FC definitions and outcome measures in pediatric RCTs.
  • There is a need for standardized definitions, outcome measures, and validated instruments.
  • A minimum core outcome set is recommended for pediatric FC research to enable cross-study comparisons.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos