Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
Published on: August 29, 2025
Is There a Consensus on Consensus Methodology? Descriptions and Recommendations for Future Consensus Research
Jane Waggoner1, Jan D Carline, Steven J Durning
1J. Waggoner is research scientist, Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington. J.D. Carline is professor of biomedical informatics and medical education and director of educational evaluation, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington. S.J. Durning is professor of medicine, Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences School of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland.
Abstract:
The authors of this article reviewed the methodology of three common consensus methods: nominal group process, consensus development panels, and the Delphi technique. The authors set out to determine how a majority of researchers are conducting these studies, how they are analyzing results, and subsequently the manner in which they are reporting their findings. The authors conclude with a set of guidelines and suggestions designed to aid researchers who choose to use the consensus methodology in their work.Overall, researchers need to describe their inclusion criteria. In addition to this, on the basis of the current literature the authors found that a panel size of 5 to 11 members was most beneficial across all consensus methods described. Lastly, the authors agreed that the statistical analyses done in consensus method studies should be as rigorous as possible and that the predetermined definition of consensus must be included in the ultimate manuscript. More specific recommendations are given for each of the three consensus methods described in the article.
Related Concept Videos
Social Proof
Ethics in Research
Groupthink
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect

