Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
An Extension of the Propensity Score Adjustment Method for the Analysis of Group Differences in MIMIC Models
Abstract:
This article proposes an extension of the propensity score adjustment method to latent variable models. The propensity score was proposed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) as a means of balancing treatment and control groups with respect to observed covariates in non-randomized studies. The propensity score is defined as the conditional probability of assignment to a treatment group given a set of observed covariates. In a typical application of this approach, each observation is associated with a propensity to be assigned to the treatment group. The distribution of propensity scores is then divided into strata and analyses of treatment group differences are conducted within strata. Comparisons of treatment group differences within and across strata provide evidence for whether or not the bias due to non-random selection into treatment groups has been accounted for by the propensity score adjustment. This article extends the application of the propensity score approach to the analysis of group differences on latent variables. In particular, multi-sample MIMIC modeling is utilized to test hypotheses about treatment group differences on latent variables across strata. The role of factorial invariance as it relates to the approach advocated in this article is also discussed. An application to the problem of academic tracking differences in self-concept and locus-of-control, using data from the National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988 (National Center for Education Statistics, 1988), illustrates the procedure.
More Related Videos
09:38Generalized Psychophysiological Interaction PPI Analysis of Memory Related Connectivity in Individuals at Genetic Risk for Alzheimer's Disease
Published on: November 14, 2017
14:14The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
Published on: May 13, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Bonferroni Test
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Nonconscious Mimicry
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes