A randomized, double-blind phase II study evaluating cediranib versus cediranib and saracatinib in patients with

T Powles1, J Brown2, J Larkin3

  • 1Department of Medical Oncology, The Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London Barts Cancer Institute, CRUK Experiment Cancer Medicine Centre, London thomas.powles@bartshealth.nhs.uk.

Abstract

Insights

Adding the SRC inhibitor saracatinib to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted therapy did not improve outcomes for patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cancer (mRCC). Biomarker analysis did not reveal predictive markers for treatment response.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Medical Research
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Preclinical studies suggested SRC proteins contribute to resistance against VEGF-targeted therapy in metastatic clear-cell renal cancer (mRCC).
  • This led to investigating the efficacy of combining a SRC inhibitor (saracatinib) with a VEGF inhibitor (cediranib).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate if combining cediranib with saracatinib improves progression-free survival (PFS) in mRCC patients who progressed on prior VEGF-targeted therapy.
  • To identify potential biomarkers predictive of treatment response.

Main Methods:

  • A double-blind, randomized phase II study compared cediranib plus saracatinib (CS) versus cediranib plus placebo (C).
  • 138 patients with mRCC and prior VEGF-targeted therapy were enrolled.
  • Archived tissue samples were analyzed for biomarkers including SRC, FAK, and HIF-2α.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in PFS or overall survival (OS) was observed between the CS and C groups.
  • Partial response rates were similar in both arms (14.5% for CS vs. 13.0% for C).
  • FAK overexpression showed a trend towards OS benefit with CS, but was not prognostic for PFS.

Conclusions:

  • Saracatinib did not enhance the efficacy of cediranib in this patient population.
  • No consistent predictive biomarkers for treatment efficacy were identified in this study.