Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
External Validation of the Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes Decision Rule
Edward Carlton1, Richard Body2, Kim Greaves1
1Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, Dorset, UK.
Insights
The Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (MACS) decision rule effectively identifies emergency department patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes (ACS) suitable for early discharge. This validation confirms its high sensitivity for detecting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Diagnostic Accuracy
Background:
- The Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (MACS) decision rule aids in diagnosing acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in emergency department (ED) patients.
- It has the potential to enhance efficiency by identifying patients eligible for discharge after initial testing.
- High-sensitivity troponin and heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (h-FABP) are key biomarkers in ACS assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To externally validate the MACS decision rule in a new cohort of prospectively recruited ED patients.
- To establish the diagnostic accuracy of the MACS rule as a discharge tool for suspected ACS.
- To assess the rule's ability to identify very low-risk patients for immediate discharge.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, single-center cohort study included 782 adult ED patients with suspected ACS.
- Serum samples were analyzed for h-FABP and high-sensitivity troponin T upon arrival.
- The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 30 days; the secondary outcome was acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
Main Results:
- 17.0% of patients were identified as "very low risk" with 0% incidence of MACE or AMI.
- The MACS rule demonstrated 100% sensitivity for MACE (95% CI = 95.4%–100%) and AMI (95% CI = 94.1%–100%) at 30 days.
- The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for MACE prediction was 0.87 (95% CI = 0.83–0.91).
Conclusions:
- The MACS decision rule reliably identifies a significant proportion of ED patients with suspected ACS suitable for discharge.
- This external validation confirms the MACS rule's power as a diagnostic tool in this patient population.
- A randomized controlled trial is warranted to confirm the clinical utility of the MACS rule in routine practice.
Objectives:
The Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (MACS) decision rule has been shown to be a powerful diagnostic tool in emergency department (ED) patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes (ACS). It has the potential to improve system efficiency by identifying patients suitable for discharge after a single blood draw for high-sensitivity troponin and heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (h-FABP) analysis at presentation to the ED. The objective was to externally validate the MACS decision rule and establish its diagnostic accuracy as a discharge tool in a new set of prospectively recruited ED patients.
Methods:
In this preplanned analysis of a prospectively recruited single-center cohort, consecutive ED patients ≥18 years with suspected ACS were included. Testing for h-FABP and high-sensitivity troponin T was undertaken on serum drawn on arrival, and any clinical features required to calculate the MACS rule were recorded. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 30 days (acute myocardial infarction [AMI], death, or revascularization). The secondary outcome was AMI alone, adjudicated using 6-hour troponin results.
Results:
Of the 782 participants included, 78 (10.0%) developed MACE and 61 (7.8%) had an AMI. Of participants, 133 (17.0%) were identified as "very low risk" and therefore suitable for immediate discharge with a 0% incidence of MACE or AMI. Of remaining patients, 314 (40.2%) were "low risk," 320 (40.9%) were "moderate risk," and 15 (1.9%) were "high risk," with incidences of MACE of 2.2, 19.7, and 53.3%, respectively. The sensitivity was 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 95.4% to 100%) for MACE at 30 days and 100% (95% CI = 94.1% to 100%) for AMI. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87 (95% CI = 0.83 to 0.91) for the MACS rule in the prediction of MACE.
Conclusions:
In this prospectively recruited cohort of ED patients with suspected ACS, the MACS decision rule identifies a significant proportion of patients who are suitable for immediate discharge after a single blood draw at presentation, with a very low risk of MACE at 30 days. This study externally validates previous findings that the MACS rule is a powerful diagnostic tool in this setting. A randomized controlled trial to establish the utility of the rule in an everyday clinical setting is justified.
More Related Videos
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
10:28Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome II: Pathophysiology and Clinical Manifestations
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT