Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

17:14
In vivo and in vitro Studies of Adaptor-clathrin Interaction
Published on: January 26, 2011
15.2K
Structural Basis of an N-Degron Adaptor with More Stringent Specificity
Benjamin J Stein1, Robert A Grant1, Robert T Sauer1
1Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Structure (London, England : 1993)
|January 26, 2016
Summary
In bacteria, two ClpS proteins fine-tune protein degradation by controlling which N-terminal residues are recognized. This study reveals ClpS2
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Molecular Biology
- Biochemistry
Background:
- The N-end rule pathway regulates protein stability based on N-terminal amino acid residues.
- Bacterial protein degradation involves the ClpAP protease and ClpS adaptor proteins.
- Many alpha-proteobacteria, including A. tumefaciens, possess two distinct ClpS paralogs: ClpS1 and ClpS2.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the substrate recognition and specificity of ClpS1 and ClpS2 from A. tumefaciens.
- To elucidate the structural basis for differential substrate binding between ClpS1 and ClpS2.
- To understand the functional implications of having multiple ClpS paralogs in N-end rule degradation.
Main Methods:
- Biochemical assays to assess substrate delivery to ClpA by ClpS1 and ClpS2.
- X-ray crystallography to determine the structures of ClpS2 bound and unbound to ligands.
- Structure-guided mutagenesis to probe the substrate-binding pocket of ClpS2.
- Analysis of differential gene expression for ClpS1 and ClpS2 during bacterial growth.
Main Results:
- Both A. tumefaciens ClpS1 and ClpS2 can deliver N-end rule substrates to the ClpA protease.
- ClpS2 exhibits higher substrate specificity, recognizing a narrower range of N-end rule residues compared to ClpS1.
- Structural analysis revealed conformational changes and remodeling within the ClpS2 substrate-binding pocket, explaining its enhanced specificity.
- Differential expression patterns of ClpS1 and ClpS2 were observed during A. tumefaciens growth.
Conclusions:
- The distinct specificities and expression patterns of ClpS1 and ClpS2 allow for fine-tuning of N-end rule-mediated protein degradation in A. tumefaciens.
- The structural plasticity of the ClpS2 binding pocket underlies its specialized substrate recognition.
- The presence of multiple ClpS paralogs provides a regulatory mechanism for controlling protein turnover in alpha-proteobacteria.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ligand Binding and Linkage
5.9K
Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked. In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...
5.9K
Conserved Binding Sites
5.3K
Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
5.3K
Assembly of Signaling Complexes
7.1K
Multiprotein signaling complexes are formed in a dynamic process involving protein-protein interactions at the cytoplasmic domain of transmembrane receptors or enzymatic and non-enzymatic proteins associated with the receptor. These complexes ensure the activation and propagation of intracellular signals that regulate cell functions.
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
7.1K
Ligand Binding Sites
15.7K
Proteins are dynamic macromolecules that carry out a wide variety of essential processes; however, the activities of most proteins depend on their interactions with other molecules or ions, known as ligands.
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
Protein-ligand interactions are quite specific; even though numerous potential ligands surround a cellular protein at any given time, only a particular ligand can bind to that protein. Moreover, a ligand binds only to a dedicated area on the surface of the protein, known as the...
15.7K
Ligand Binding Sites
9.1K
9.1K
Transfer RNA Synthesis
13.7K
One of the unique features of tRNA is the presence of modified bases. In some tRNAs, modified bases account for nearly 20% of the total bases in the molecule. Altogether, these unusual bases protect the tRNA from enzymatic degradation by RNases.
Each of these chemical modifications is carried by a specific enzyme, post-transcription. All of these enzymes have unique base and site-specificity. Methylation, the most common chemical modification, is carried by at least nine different enzymes, with...
Each of these chemical modifications is carried by a specific enzyme, post-transcription. All of these enzymes have unique base and site-specificity. Methylation, the most common chemical modification, is carried by at least nine different enzymes, with...
13.7K

