Related Experiment Videos
The Van Deventer Lecture. 'Prematurity: the changing scene'
1Department of Perinatal Medicine and Child Health, University of Bristol, Southmead Hospital, U.K.
Insights
Neonatal intensive care has evolved significantly, improving survival for premature infants. Future challenges include protecting preterm infants and preventing premature birth.
Area of Science:
- Neonatology and Perinatal Medicine
- Pediatric Critical Care
Background:
- The institutional care of newborns, particularly premature infants, originated in Europe over a century ago.
- Care shifted from physicians to nurses and back to pediatricians, influenced by wartime advancements and evolving societal views on family size and infant survival.
Observation:
- Therapeutic breakthroughs like blood transfusions and antibiotics, alongside enhanced understanding of newborn physiology and pathology, spurred pediatrician involvement in neonatal care.
- Increased access to birth control and a desire for fewer, surviving children shifted focus towards neonatal survival.
Findings:
- Advancements in neonatal intensive care have progressively lowered the threshold of viability to approximately 22 weeks' gestation and 500g birthweight.
- Significant challenges persist regarding the short- and long-term morbidity of preterm infants, associated costs, and ethical considerations in intensive care provision.
Implications:
- Future efforts must focus on protecting preterm infants from perinatal damage.
- The primary future challenge is the prevention of premature delivery itself.
Abstract:
Institutional medical care of newborn infants including premature 'weaklings', had its roots in Europe about 100 years ago. Unfortunately, the physician-accoucheurs who were responsible for the new development soon gave way to surgeon-gynaecologists, and for the next half century newborn infants returned to the care of the nursery nurse. The Second World War accelerated many changes. Therapeutic advances such as the development of blood transfusion, antibiotics, and the technology of infant care, coupled with an improved understanding of the physiology and pathology of the newborn, encouraged paediatricians to enter the field. At the same time, women had become more emancipated and now had improved methods of birth control. Instead of accepting large families and an 'inevitable' wastage, especially of premature infants, they wished for few children and for all of them to survive. As neonatal intensive care developed over the last two decades, the limit of viability has been steadily pushed down towards 22 weeks' gestation and 500 g birthweight. There remain the problems associated with short- and long-term neonatal morbidity among preterm infants, including the expense that this engenders and the ethics of providing or withholding intensive care in individual cases. The future holds two main challenges: protection of the preterm infant from damage during the perinatal period and, above all, the prevention of premature delivery itself.