Comparison of electrophysiological effects of calcium channel blockers on cardiac repolarization
Hyang-Ae Lee1, Sung-Ae Hyun2, Sung-Gurl Park2
1Next-generation Pharmaceutical Research Center, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Daejeon 34114, Korea.; Department of Physiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul 03080, Korea.; Human and Environmental Toxicology Program, University of Science and Technology, Daejeon 34113, Korea.
Insights
Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs) like nicardipine and amlodipine may not increase arrhythmia risk as they also inhibit potassium channels, unlike isradipine. This study clarifies their distinct electrophysiological effects on cardiac action potentials.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Pharmacology
- Electrophysiology
- Ion Channel Modulation
Background:
- Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are crucial for cardiovascular disease treatment.
- Reduced calcium channel current (I Ca) by CCBs can shorten action potential duration (APD), potentially causing arrhythmia.
- Understanding the differential effects of CCBs on cardiac ion channels is vital for safety.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the electrophysiological effects of nicardipine (NIC), isradipine (ISR), and amlodipine (AML) on cardiac action potential duration (APD).
- To examine the impact of these CCBs on key cardiac ion currents, including I Ca, I Kr, I Ks, and I Na.
- To determine if inhibition of repolarizing currents by CCBs could offset APD shortening.
Main Methods:
- Electrophysiological recordings in rabbit Purkinje fibers.
- Concentration-dependent inhibition assays of I Ca in rat cardiomyocytes.
- Voltage-gated ion channel current measurements (I Kr, I Ks, I Na).
Main Results:
- NIC, ISR, and AML demonstrated similar potency in blocking I Ca (IC50 values in nM range).
- ISR significantly shortened both APD50 and APD90 at 1 µM; NIC and AML only shortened APD50 up to 30 µM.
- NIC and AML concentration-dependently inhibited I Kr and I Ks, while ISR showed only partial inhibition (<50% at 30 µM).
- All three CCBs inhibited I Na to a similar extent.
Conclusions:
- NIC and AML inhibit both I Ca and repolarizing K+ currents (I Kr, I Ks).
- The inhibition of I Kr and I Ks by NIC and AML may counteract the AP-shortening effects of I Ca blockade.
- ISR's limited effect on I Kr and I Ks suggests a potentially higher risk of APD shortening and associated arrhythmias compared to NIC and AML.
Abstract:
Dihydropyridine (DHP) calcium channel blockers (CCBs) have been widely used to treat of several cardiovascular diseases. An excessive shortening of action potential duration (APD) due to the reduction of Ca(2+) channel current (I Ca) might increase the risk of arrhythmia. In this study we investigated the electrophysiological effects of nicardipine (NIC), isradipine (ISR), and amlodipine (AML) on the cardiac APD in rabbit Purkinje fibers, voltage-gated K(+) channel currents (I Kr, I Ks) and voltage-gated Na(+) channel current (I Na). The concentration-dependent inhibition of Ca(2+) channel currents (I Ca) was examined in rat cardiomyocytes; these CCBs have similar potency on I Ca channel blocking with IC50 (the half-maximum inhibiting concentration) values of 0.142, 0.229, and 0.227 nM on NIC, ISR, and AML, respectively. However, ISR shortened both APD50 and APD90 already at 1 µM whereas NIC and AML shortened APD50 but not APD90 up to 30 µM. According to ion channel studies, NIC and AML concentration-dependently inhibited I Kr and I Ks while ISR had only partial inhibitory effects (<50% at 30 µM). Inhibition of I Na was similarly observed in the three CCBs. Since the I Kr and I Ks mainly contribute to cardiac repolarization, their inhibition by NIC and AML could compensate for the AP shortening effects due to the block of I Ca.
More Related Videos
10:53Isolation of Human Atrial Myocytes for Simultaneous Measurements of Ca2+ Transients and Membrane Currents
Published on: July 3, 2013
09:35Preclinical Cardiac Electrophysiology Assessment by Dual Voltage and Calcium Optical Mapping of Human Organotypic Cardiac Slices
Published on: June 16, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Antihypertensive Drugs: Action of Calcium Channel Blockers
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Cardiac Action Potential
The cardiac action potential process involves a series of phases characterized by the movement of ions across the cardiac cell membranes, leading to the depolarization and repolarization of the cardiac myocytes.
Ionic Basis of Cardiac Action Potentials
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers
