Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026
09:51
The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
3.8K
Patient injuries in primary total hip replacement.
Teemu Helkamaa1, Eero Hirvensalo1,2, Heini Huhtala3
1a Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology , Helsinki University Central Hospital .
Acta Orthopaedica
|January 26, 2016
Summary
Patient injuries from total hip replacements (THRs) can be avoided. Higher hospital volume, defined as 400+ primary THRs annually, significantly reduces patient injury risks, especially technical errors like cup malposition.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Patient safety
- Health services research
Background:
- Primary total hip replacements (THRs) yield excellent outcomes but can involve serious patient injuries.
- Analyzing nationwide patient injury claims provides crucial insights into THR complications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comprehensively analyze primary total hip replacement (THR)-related patient injuries nationwide.
- To identify common injury types and contributing factors, including hospital volume.
Main Methods:
- Evaluation of all primary THR-related patient injury claims in Finland (2008-2010).
- Utilized medical records and national registries (Care Register, Patient Injury Claim Register).
Main Results:
- 563 claims identified; 44% compensated (n=250).
- 79% of compensated claims were avoidable treatment injuries; 21% were severe infections.
- Cup malposition was the most common technical error (31%).
- High-volume hospitals (≥400 THRs/year) showed significantly lower injury rates compared to low-volume hospitals.
Conclusions:
- This study offers the first nationwide data on THR patient injury types.
- Hospital volume is a key factor influencing the quality and frequency of THR errors.
- An annual volume of ≥400 primary THRs acts as a protective factor against patient injuries.
