Cluster randomised-control trial for an Australian child protection education program: Study protocol for the Learn

Codi White1, Dianne C Shanley2, Melanie J Zimmer-Gembeck3

  • 1School of Applied Psychology and Menzies Health Institute of Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia. codi.white@griffithuni.edu.au.

BMC Public Health
|January 27, 2016
PubMed

Insights

This study evaluates an Australian school-based child protection program for young children. The rigorous trial uses a cluster randomized controlled trial design to assess program effectiveness and long-term outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Child development
  • Public health
  • Education

Background:

  • Child maltreatment has significant negative impacts on children's health and development.
  • Few child protection education programs undergo rigorous evaluation.
  • This study evaluates an Australian school-based program for first-grade students.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of a school-based child protection education program.
  • To assess children's knowledge, skills, and help-seeking behaviors.
  • To examine long-term outcomes and parental involvement.

Main Methods:

  • A multi-site cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 24 Queensland primary schools.
  • Intervention delivered in 5 sessions to first-grade students (aged 5-6 years).
  • Data collected at baseline, post-intervention, and 6, 12, and 18-month follow-ups; assessors blinded.

Main Results:

  • Primary outcomes include children's knowledge, intentions, simulated behavior, and anxiety.
  • Secondary outcomes assess parent-child discussions, observations, satisfaction, and parental stress.
  • A process evaluation will assess program implementation.

Conclusions:

  • This RCT addresses limitations of previous studies through school-level randomization and extended follow-up.
  • It investigates parental discussion of content and potential moderating/mediating effects.
  • The study tests novel measures for assessing children's safety discrimination and disclosure abilities.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
25.0K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
67.1K