Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Measurement of Fronto-limbic Activity Using an Emotional Oddball Task in Children with Familial High Risk for Schizophrenia
Published on: December 2, 2015
Cluster randomised-control trial for an Australian child protection education program: Study protocol for the Learn
Codi White1, Dianne C Shanley2, Melanie J Zimmer-Gembeck3
1School of Applied Psychology and Menzies Health Institute of Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia. codi.white@griffithuni.edu.au.
Insights
This study evaluates an Australian school-based child protection program for young children. The rigorous trial uses a cluster randomized controlled trial design to assess program effectiveness and long-term outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Child development
- Public health
- Education
Background:
- Child maltreatment has significant negative impacts on children's health and development.
- Few child protection education programs undergo rigorous evaluation.
- This study evaluates an Australian school-based program for first-grade students.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a school-based child protection education program.
- To assess children's knowledge, skills, and help-seeking behaviors.
- To examine long-term outcomes and parental involvement.
Main Methods:
- A multi-site cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving 24 Queensland primary schools.
- Intervention delivered in 5 sessions to first-grade students (aged 5-6 years).
- Data collected at baseline, post-intervention, and 6, 12, and 18-month follow-ups; assessors blinded.
Main Results:
- Primary outcomes include children's knowledge, intentions, simulated behavior, and anxiety.
- Secondary outcomes assess parent-child discussions, observations, satisfaction, and parental stress.
- A process evaluation will assess program implementation.
Conclusions:
- This RCT addresses limitations of previous studies through school-level randomization and extended follow-up.
- It investigates parental discussion of content and potential moderating/mediating effects.
- The study tests novel measures for assessing children's safety discrimination and disclosure abilities.
Background:
Child maltreatment has severe short-and long-term consequences for children's health, development, and wellbeing. Despite the provision of child protection education programs in many countries, few have been rigorously evaluated to determine their effectiveness. We describe the design of a multi-site gold standard evaluation of an Australian school-based child protection education program. The intervention has been developed by a not-for-profit agency and comprises 5 1-h sessions delivered to first grade students (aged 5-6 years) in their regular classrooms. It incorporates common attributes of effective programs identified in the literature, and aligns with the Australian education curriculum.
Methods/Design:
A three-site cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) of Learn to be safe with Emmy and friends™ will be conducted with children in approximately 72 first grade classrooms in 24 Queensland primary (elementary) schools from three state regions, over a period of 2 years. Entire schools will be randomised, using a computer generated list of random numbers, to intervention and wait-list control conditions, to prevent contamination effects across students and classes. Data will be collected at baseline (pre-assessment), immediately after the intervention (post-assessment), and at 6-, 12-, and 18-months (follow-up assessments). Outcome assessors will be blinded to group membership. Primary outcomes assessed are children's knowledge of program concepts; intentions to use program knowledge, skills, and help-seeking strategies; actual use of program material in a simulated situation; and anxiety arising from program participation. Secondary outcomes include a parent discussion monitor, parent observations of their children's use of program materials, satisfaction with the program, and parental stress. A process evaluation will be conducted concurrently to assess program performance.
Discussion:
This RCT addresses shortcomings in previous studies and methodologically extends research in this area by randomising at school-level to prevent cross-learning between conditions; providing longer-term outcome assessment than any previous study; examining the degree to which parents/guardians discuss intervention content with children at home; assessing potential moderating/mediating effects of family and child demographic variables; testing an in-vivo measure to assess children's ability to discriminate safe/unsafe situations and disclose to trusted adults; and testing enhancements to existing measures to establish greater internal consistency.
Trial Registration:
Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register (ACTRN12615000917538). Registered (02/09/2015).
More Related Videos
07:59Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
Published on: June 14, 2019
08:42A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
Published on: July 31, 2017
Related Concept Videos
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Group Design
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
The Scientific Method