Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Towards deep inclusion for equity-oriented health research priority-setting: A working model.
Bridget Pratt1, Maria Merritt2, Adnan A Hyder2
1Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA; Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, USA; Nossal Institute of Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.
National health research priority-setting must promote health equity through deep inclusion. A new model defines deep inclusion by breadth, qualitative equality, and high-quality non-elite participation for equitable research investments.
Area of Science:
- Health Policy
- Research Ethics
- Health Equity
Background:
- Growing consensus calls for aligning health research funding with national priorities.
- Justice in research priority-setting necessitates promoting health equity.
- Existing frameworks lack specific guidance for equity-oriented research priority-setting.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose requirements for equity-oriented national health research priority-setting.
- To introduce and define a model of "deep inclusion" as a procedural component.
- To guide policymakers in designing and assessing inclusive priority-setting processes.
Main Methods:
- Applied concepts from deliberative democracy and development ethics.
- Developed a model of deep inclusion with three dimensions: breadth, qualitative equality, and high-quality non-elite participation.
- Used health systems research as a sustained example for illustration.
Main Results:
- Deep inclusion involves not only who participates but also how and when non-elite stakeholders are involved.
- The proposed model offers a framework for understanding and achieving meaningful stakeholder involvement.
- Practical challenges to implementing deep inclusion were reviewed.
Conclusions:
- Deep inclusion is crucial for equitable national health research priority-setting.
- The model provides a practical tool for policymakers and stakeholders.
- Despite implementation barriers, the model enhances the inclusivity and equity of research priority-setting processes.
More Related Videos
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Equity Theory
Ethics in Research
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare: