Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
Sexual Orientation, Objective Height, and Self-Reported Height
Malvina N Skorska1, Anthony F Bogaert2
1a Department of Psychology , Brock University.
Abstract:
Studies that have used mostly self-reported height have found that androphilic men and women are shorter than gynephilic men and women, respectively. This study examined whether an objective height difference exists or whether a psychosocial account (e.g., distortion of self-reports) may explain these putative height differences. A total of 863 participants, recruited at a Canadian university, the surrounding region, and through lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) events across Canada, self-reported their height and had their height measured. Androphilic men were shorter, on average, than gynephilic men. There was no objective height difference between gynephilic, ambiphilic, and androphilic women. Self-reported height, statistically controlling for objective height, was not related to sexual orientation. These findings are the first to show an objective height difference between androphilic and gynephilic men. Also, the findings suggest that previous studies using self-reported height found part of a true objective height difference between androphilic and gynephilic men. These findings have implications for existing biological theories of men's sexual orientation development.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Polygenic Traits
Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Factors Influencing Attraction II: Physical Attraction

