Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026
Primary Outcome Assessment in a Pig Model of Acute Myocardial Infarction
Published on: October 14, 2016
Epicardial adipose tissue volume but not density is an independent predictor for myocardial ischemia
Michaela M Hell1, Xiaowei Ding2, Mathieu Rubeaux3
1Department of Cardiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Ulmenweg 18, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Background:
Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume is associated with plaque formation and cardiovascular event risk, its density may reflect tissue composition and metabolic activity.
Objectives:
Global and regional associations between EAT volume and density, ischemia and coronary calcium were investigated using a novel automatic quantitative measurement software.
Methods:
71 patients with an intermediate pre-test probability for coronary artery disease and inducible ischemia by SPECT were matched to two same-gender controls (total of 213 patients, 90% male, age 60 ± 10 years). Non-contrast CT for assessment of EAT volume, density (in Hounsfield Unit [HU]) and coronary calcium score (CCS) was performed.
Results:
Global EAT volume was significantly increased in ischemic patients compared to controls (96 ± 49 vs. 82 ± 36 cm(3), p = 0.04), density showed no significant difference (-75.6 ± 4.3 vs. -75.1 ± 4.1HU, p = 0.63). EAT volume and density differed significantly between coronary territories (LAD: 37 ± 18 cm(3), -77.8 ± 4.5HU; LCx: 16 ± 9 cm(3), -73.9 ± 4.1HU; RCA: 36 ± 17 cm(3), -71.7 ± 4.8HU, p < 0.001). For regional ischemia, only LCx territory showed a significantly higher EAT volume (18 ± 8 vs. 16 ± 9 cm(3), p = 0.048). Multivariable logistic regression revealed a significant association with ischemia for EAT volume (OR 2.09 (1.0; 4.3), p = 0.049) and CCS (OR 1.43 (1.1; 1.9), p = 0.006). EAT volume significantly improved discrimination of ischemia over CCS (Integrated Discrimination Improvement: 3.5%, 95%CI: 1.1-6.1%, p = 0.004). Hypertension was the only risk factor significantly influencing EAT volume and density (98 ± 48 vs. 78 ± 31 cm(3), p = 0.002, -76.0 ± 4.1 vs. -74.5 ± 4.1 HU, p = 0.01).
Conclusions:
EAT volume is associated with myocardial ischemia and improves the discriminative power for independent ischemia prediction over CCS. In hypertensive patients, EAT is characterized by lower density and higher volumes.
