Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026
Microvascular Decompression: Salient Surgical Principles and Technical Nuances
Published on: July 5, 2011
Impact of operation details on hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy
Qiang-Ping Wang1, Jun-Peng Ma, Zhang-Ming Zhou
1Department of Neurosurgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Objective:
To evaluate the correlation between the distance of craniectomy from the midline and hydrocephalus after DC.
Methods:
The following electronic databases were searched from their inception to June 2015: Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Science Direct, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM), and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). All randomized clinical trials, prospective cohort, retrospective observational cohort, and case-control studies investigating the relationship between distance of craniectomy from the midline and hydrocephalus after DC were enrolled. The Cochrane Collaborations software RevMan 5.3 was used for meta-analysis.
Results:
Six retrospective cohort studies involving 462 participants were included. Pooled analysis of 4 studies suggested that craniectomy close to the midline (<25 mm) was associated with a significantly increased risk of postoperative hydrocephalus (odds ratio [OR] = 3.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3 - 9.97, p=0.01). However, meta analysis of 4 studies did not find statistical differences when comparing the distance of craniectomy from the midline in the hydrocephalus group and that in the non-hydrocephalus group (OR= - 0.14, 95% CI: -0.44 - 0.15, p=0.34).
Conclusion:
Available evidence was insufficient to support the theory that craniectomy close to the midline increases the risk of developing hydrocephalus after DC. Well conducted randomized clinical trials are required to verify this issue.
