Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding
Jane Marjoribanks1, Anne Lethaby, Cindy Farquhar
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Park Rd, Grafton, Auckland, New Zealand, 1003.
Surgery, particularly hysterectomy, is more effective for heavy menstrual bleeding than medical treatments within the first year. However, less invasive options like the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUS) and conservative surgery are recommended as first-line therapies.
Area of Science:
- Gynecology
- Reproductive Medicine
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) significantly impacts women's quality of life.
- Management of HMB is individualized, with surgical and medical options available.
- Surgical options include hysterectomy and conservative procedures; medical options include oral medication and the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUS).
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of surgical interventions versus medical therapies for managing heavy menstrual bleeding.
- To synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating different treatment modalities for HMB.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of 15 parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 1289 women.
- Searched multiple databases (Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, clinical trials registers) up to January 2016.
- Primary outcomes included menstrual bleeding control, patient satisfaction, and adverse events; data were pooled using fixed-effect models; evidence quality was assessed using GRADE.
Main Results:
- Surgery (endometrial resection) demonstrated greater control of menstrual bleeding compared to oral medication at 4 months and 2 years, but not at 5 years.
- Hysterectomy showed better objective bleeding control than LNG-IUS at one year; conservative surgery offered better subjective bleeding control and satisfaction than LNG-IUS at one year.
- Adverse events were fewer with surgery initially, but long-term follow-up revealed significant crossover from medical to surgical treatments, complicating direct comparisons.
Conclusions:
- Surgery, especially hysterectomy, offers more immediate reduction in menstrual bleeding compared to medical treatments.
- The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUS) and conservative surgery are effective, safe, and acceptable first-line treatments for HMB.
- While hysterectomy is definitive, less radical treatments are advisable initially due to potential serious complications associated with major surgery.
More Related Videos
11:29Surgical Techniques to Optimize Ovarian Reserve during Laparoscopic Cystectomy for Ovarian Endometrioma
Published on: January 22, 2022
05:21Laparoscopic Extracorporeal Knot-Tying for Uterine Vessel Occlusion during Hysterectomy with Cervical Cerclage in Large Uteri
Published on: September 12, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care