Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Causes of Social Behavior I: Actions and Characteristics of Individuals

Causes of Social Behavior I: Actions and Characteristics of Individuals

The actions and characteristics of others heavily influence the causes of social behaviors. Emotional expressions serve as powerful social signals, shaping behaviors and interactions in significant ways. Whether through direct observation or subconscious processing, individuals constantly adjust their responses based on the emotions and attributes of those around them.Emotional Cues and Social ResponsesFacial expressions, tone of voice, and body language provide crucial emotional cues that...

Impact of Groups on Groups

Impact of Groups on Groups

Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...

Relationship Formation

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...

Social Exchange Theory

Social Exchange Theory

We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).

Social Exchange Theory

Social Exchange Theory

As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...

Impact of Individuals on Individuals

Impact of Individuals on Individuals

Human behavior is intricately shaped by social influences that arise from interactions with others in diverse contexts. These influences not only mold beliefs and attitudes but also drive the regulation of behaviors through both direct communication and observational learning. The study of these processes falls within the domain of social psychology, which seeks to understand how individuals are affected by and affect those around them.Mechanisms of Social InfluenceDirect social influence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Phase transitions and symmetry breaking of cooperation on lattices.

Physical review. E·2025

Same author

Positive and negative selective assortment.

Journal of theoretical biology·2025

Same author

The impact of simultaneous infections on phage-host ecology.

Theoretical population biology·2024

Same author

Frequency-dependent returns in nonlinear public goods games.

Journal of the Royal Society, Interface·2024

Same author

Death-birth adaptive dynamics: modeling trait evolution.

Physical review. E·2024

Same author

Spontaneous symmetry breaking of cooperation between species.

PNAS nexus·2024

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 26, 2026

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

Targeted Cooperative Actions Shape Social Networks.

Lucas Wardil¹, Christoph Hauert¹

¹Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

|January 30, 2016

Summary

Cooperation in social networks emerges through fairness, with individuals balancing received and provided benefits. Aversion to payoff inequality drives link updates, not direct reciprocation awareness.

Area of Science:

Social network dynamics
Behavioral economics
Game theory

Background:

Cooperation models traditionally separate individual strategies from population structure.
Understanding how social networks form and evolve is crucial for studying cooperation.
Existing models often overlook the interplay between individual behavior and network topology.

Purpose of the Study:

To empirically investigate social network dynamics by amalgamating strategies and structure.
To understand the update rules individuals use for link formation and removal in social networks.
To assess the impact of direct reciprocation awareness on cooperation levels.

Main Methods:

A behavioral experiment where participants could add/remove directed links (representing cost-benefit exchanges) to recipients.

More Related Videos

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 26, 2026

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

Analysis of network density and fairness (received vs. provided benefits).

Investigation of participants' link update rules based on others' generosity and payoff.

Main Results:

Dense social networks emerged, characterized by fairness where individuals received benefits commensurate with their provisions.
The primary update rule observed was aversion to payoff inequity: adding links to worse-off individuals and removing from better-off ones.
Awareness of direct reciprocation did not significantly increase cooperation compared to conditions without such awareness.

Conclusions:

Fairness and aversion to payoff inequity are key drivers of cooperation and network structure.
Individual strategies and network structure are intrinsically linked in cooperative dynamics.
Direct reciprocation is less influential on cooperation than broader fairness considerations in these networks.