Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.6K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.6K
Sign Test for Matched Pairs01:17

Sign Test for Matched Pairs

460
The sign test for matched pairs offers a robust method for comparing two paired samples, often for the effects of an intervention in one of them. This method is very useful in situations where the underlying distribution of the data is unknown. The test compares two related samples—often pre- and post-treatment measurements on the same subjects—to determine if there are significant differences in their median values.
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...
460
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs01:09

Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs

585
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test for matched pairs evaluates the null hypothesis by combining the ranks of differences with their signs. It essentially tests whether the median of the differences in a population of matched pairs is zero. Since the test incorporates more information than the sign test, it generally yields more trustable conclusions. This test also does not require the data to follow a normal distribution, but two conditions must be met for it to be applicable: (1) the data must...
585
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

7.2K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
7.2K
Trial and Error and Algorithm01:12

Trial and Error and Algorithm

480
A problem-solving strategy is a plan of action used to find a solution. Different strategies have distinct action plans. Trial and error involves trying different solutions until one works. For instance, to fix a broken printer, you might check ink levels, ensure the paper tray isn't jammed, and verify the printer's connection to your laptop. This method can be time-consuming but is commonly used. Thomas Edison, for example, used trial and error to find a suitable filament for the light...
480
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

394
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
394

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Patterns of Change: Dynamic Typology Applied to Smoking Cessation.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

The treating physician as active gatekeeper in the recruitment of research subjects.

Medical care·2001
Same author

Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States medicare population.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2001
Same author

Pitfalls in assessing the quality of care for patients with cardiovascular disease.

The American journal of medicine·2001
Same author

The development of a decisional balance measure of physician smoking cessation interventions.

Preventive medicine·2001
Same author

Identifying a cohort of patients with early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of hospital discharge and primary data.

Medical care·2001

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.6K

A Comparison of Pattern Matching Indices.

E Guadagnoli, W Velicer

    Multivariate Behavioral Research
    |February 2, 2016
    PubMed
    Summary

    Comparing pattern matrices from different studies is crucial. This research found that saturation and sample size generally improve the accuracy of pattern matching indices, with little performance difference among most tested methods.

    Area of Science:

    • Multivariate statistics
    • Psychometrics
    • Data analysis

    Background:

    • Comparing pattern matrices from independent studies is a common challenge in multivariate applications.
    • Evaluating the performance of different pattern matching indices is essential for reliable data interpretation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the performance of four pattern matching indices: coefficient of congruence (c), s-statistic (s), Pearson's r (r), and kappa (k).
    • To investigate how experimental conditions like saturation, sample size, and number of variables affect index performance.

    Main Methods:

    • Constructed population pattern matrices by systematically varying saturation, sample size, number of observed variables, and number of derived variables.
    • Generated sample patterns and matched them to population patterns using each of the four indices.

    More Related Videos

    Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography
    10:14

    Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography

    Published on: September 2, 2020

    5.6K
    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
    07:35

    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

    Published on: October 11, 2018

    8.1K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 26, 2026

    Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
    13:51

    Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

    Published on: November 9, 2011

    20.6K
    Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography
    10:14

    Chromatographic Fingerprinting by Template Matching for Data Collected by Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography

    Published on: September 2, 2020

    5.6K
    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
    07:35

    Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

    Published on: October 11, 2018

    8.1K
  • Analyzed the accuracy of each index under different experimental conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • With the exception of Pearson's r, the four pattern matching indices showed similar performance.
    • Increased saturation (loading size) generally led to more accurate index values.
    • Increased sample size also generally resulted in more accurate index values.

    Conclusions:

    • Saturation and sample size are key factors influencing the accuracy of pattern matching indices in multivariate studies.
    • Most tested indices (c, s, k) perform comparably, suggesting flexibility in their application.
    • Researchers should consider saturation and sample size when interpreting results from pattern matrix comparisons.