Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.9K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.9K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.6K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.6K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

7.3K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
7.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

2.1K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
2.1K
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

12.0K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
12.0K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

113.5K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
113.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A refractive error prediction model for children and adolescents based on ocular biometric parameters.

BMC ophthalmology·2026
Same author

Warped density ratio estimation.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2025
Same author

A Nomogram Model for Predicting Prolonged Postoperative LOS After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Osteoarthritis Patients.

Clinical interventions in aging·2025
Same author

3D-printed bioceramic scaffolds for bone defect repair: bone aging and immune regulation.

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology·2025
Same author

Plumbagin improves myocardial fibrosis after myocardial infarction by inhibiting the AKT/mTOR pathway to upregulate autophagy levels.

International immunopharmacology·2025
Same author

Rethinking density ratio estimation based hyper-parameter optimization.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Utilizing vmTracking to Improve the Accuracy of Multi-Animal Pose Estimation in Rodent Social Behavior Studies
07:34

Utilizing vmTracking to Improve the Accuracy of Multi-Animal Pose Estimation in Rodent Social Behavior Studies

Published on: November 7, 2025

459

Multi-Target Joint Detection and Estimation Error Bound for the Sensor with Clutter and Missed Detection.

Feng Lian1, Guang-Hua Zhang2, Zhan-Sheng Duan3

  • 1Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Intelligent Networks and Network Security (MOE KLINNS), College of Electronics and Information Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China. lianfeng1981@xjtu.edu.cn.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|February 2, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This study develops an error bound for joint detection and estimation (JDE) in multi-target tracking under clutter and missed detections. The bound guides sensor design for improved performance, validated by simulations impacting JDE filters.

Keywords:
error boundjoint detection and estimationmulti-target trackingperformance evaluationrandom finite set

More Related Videos

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

2.4K
A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
12:39

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers

Published on: January 18, 2020

8.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Utilizing vmTracking to Improve the Accuracy of Multi-Animal Pose Estimation in Rodent Social Behavior Studies
07:34

Utilizing vmTracking to Improve the Accuracy of Multi-Animal Pose Estimation in Rodent Social Behavior Studies

Published on: November 7, 2025

459
Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

2.4K
A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
12:39

A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers

Published on: January 18, 2020

8.3K

Area of Science:

  • Signal Processing and Sensor Fusion
  • Probabilistic Robotics and Tracking

Background:

  • Error bounds are crucial for assessing filter performance in sensor measurement settings.
  • Optimizing sensor design and management requires understanding performance limitations for target tracking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an error bound for joint detection and estimation (JDE) of multiple targets using a single sensor.
  • To analyze the impact of clutter and missed detections on JDE performance within the Random Finite Set (RFS) framework.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized multi-Bernoulli or Poisson approximation to multi-target Bayes recursion.
  • Employed Maximum a Posteriori (MAP) detectors and unbiased estimators.
  • Applied the second-order optimal sub-pattern assignment (OSPA) distance for error metric calculation.

Main Results:

  • Derived an error bound for joint detection and estimation (JDE) under realistic sensor conditions.
  • Demonstrated that clutter density and detection probability significantly influence the error bound.
  • Verified the proposed bound's effectiveness by highlighting limitations of single-sensor Probability Hypothesis Density (PHD) and Cardinalized PHD (CPHD) filters.

Conclusions:

  • The developed error bound provides a practical measure for limiting filter performance in multi-target tracking.
  • The findings offer guidance for sensor design and management to enhance target tracking accuracy.
  • The study validates the proposed bound against established RFS-based filters, confirming its utility.