Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Adjusting for baseline: change or percentage change?
1Biometrics Department, Sterling-Winthrop Research Institute, Rensselaer, New York 12144.
Abstract:
Clinical trials data often include baseline and response measurements on each patient. Comparisons of treatments commonly employ either change from baseline or percentage change from baseline as the analysis variable. This paper provides guidance on the choice between these two by means of plots of these variables versus baseline. I provide two examples that illustrate the problem and I discuss the impact of use of the wrong adjusted response.
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Pharmacodynamic Models: Additive and Proportional Drug Effect Model
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
