Development of Real-Time PCR Methods for the Detection of Bacterial Meningitis Pathogens without DNA Extraction

Jeni Vuong1, Jean-Marc Collard2,3, Melissa J Whaley1

  • 1Meningitis and Vaccine Preventable Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States of America.

Plos One
|February 2, 2016
PubMed

Insights

Direct real-time PCR (rt-PCR) methods for detecting meningitis pathogens like Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae eliminate DNA extraction. PerfeCTa direct rt-PCR showed comparable or superior sensitivity and specificity to traditional methods, reducing time and cost.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Diagnostics
  • Microbiology
  • Infectious Diseases

Background:

  • Bacterial meningitis is primarily caused by Neisseria meningitidis (Nm), Haemophilus influenzae (Hi), and Streptococcus pneumoniae (Sp).
  • Traditional real-time PCR (rt-PCR) for detecting these pathogens requires DNA extraction, a time-consuming and labor-intensive step that can inhibit PCR results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate two direct rt-PCR methods (PerfeCTa and 5x Omni) that bypass the DNA extraction step for detecting Nm, Hi, and Sp.
  • To compare the sensitivity and specificity of these direct rt-PCR methods against the standard TaqMan traditional rt-PCR.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated eleven rt-PCR tests: five species-specific (Nm-sodC, -ctrA; Hi-hpd#1, -hpd#3; Sp-lytA) and six serogroup-specific for Nm (A, B, C, W, X, Y).
  • Compared direct rt-PCR assays (PerfeCTa, 5x Omni) with TaqMan traditional rt-PCR using clinical specimens.
  • Assessed Lower Limit of Detection (LLD), diagnostic sensitivity, and specificity for all tested assays.

Main Results:

  • PerfeCTa direct rt-PCR demonstrated the lowest LLD (168–6,836 CFU/ml) compared to 5x Omni (1,824–135,982 CFU/ml) and TaqMan (6,227–272,229 CFU/ml).
  • PerfeCTa direct rt-PCR showed high diagnostic sensitivity (89.4%–99.8%) and specificity (92.9%–99.9%), comparable or superior to 5x Omni and TaqMan.
  • Direct rt-PCR methods significantly reduce processing time, cost, and risk of cross-contamination while conserving valuable CSF specimens.

Conclusions:

  • Direct rt-PCR, particularly the PerfeCTa method, offers a viable and efficient alternative to traditional rt-PCR for bacterial meningitis detection.
  • This approach is highly beneficial for laboratories with high testing volumes, improving throughput and resource management.
  • Eliminating DNA extraction streamlines the diagnostic workflow for critical meningitis pathogens.

Related Concept Videos

Real Time RT-PCR02:57

Real Time RT-PCR

Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, or Real-time RT-PCR, is an analytical tool used to determine the expression level of target genes. The method involves converting mRNA to complementary DNA with the help of an enzyme known as reverse transcriptase, followed by the PCR amplification of the cDNA. These two processes can be performed simultaneously in a single tube or separately as a two-step reaction.
The real-time quantification of the number of amplified products is...
66.6K
DNA Isolation01:24

DNA Isolation

DNA isolation protocols can be fast and straightforward or complex and time-consuming depending on the type and quality of DNA required for further processing. For example, plasmid DNA extraction is a bit more complicated than genomic DNA extraction because of the need for an appropriate lysis method to separate plasmid DNA from gDNA during isolation. However, for specific applications, such as long-range DNA sequencing that require a good yield of high- quality DNA samples, we need to follow...
46.3K
Viral Meningitis01:18

Viral Meningitis

Viral meningitis is the most common form of meningitis and is often referred to as aseptic meningitis to indicate the absence of bacterial involvement. It is generally milder than bacterial meningitis, with symptoms including fever, headache, stiff neck, drowsiness, nausea, photophobia, and vomiting. Rarely, more severe manifestations or death may occur. Common causative agents include enteroviruses, particularly coxsackie A and B viruses and echoviruses, all members of the Enterovirus genus...
44