Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

6.8K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
6.8K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

4.2K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
4.2K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

3.0K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
3.0K
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

616
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
616
Sample Size Calculation01:19

Sample Size Calculation

6.8K
Knowledge of the sample size is the first requirement to conduct random sampling or an experiment. The sample size is the total number of units, observations, or groups (in some cases) used to get the data to estimate a population parameter. As the name suggests, the sample size is that of the sample drawn from the population and differs from the population size.
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
6.8K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

6.1K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
6.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Altered amygdala resting-state functional connectivity in anxiety disorders: a coordinate-based meta-analysis.

Psychological medicine·2026
Same author

Comparative biomechanical and molecular mechanisms shaping erect and prostrate winter growth habits in wheat.

Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology·2026
Same author

Switchgrass transcription factor PvATAF2 plays positive roles in plant root-zone low-temperature tolerance.

International journal of biological macromolecules·2026
Same author

Deteriorated Gray Matter Connectome in Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Graph Theory Analysis of Individual-Level Gray Matter Morphological Networks.

Brain and behavior·2025
Same author

Divergent structural and functional brain alterations in HIV-infected patients: a multimodal meta-analysis.

Frontiers in neurology·2025
Same author

Transcriptome, Metabolome, and Physiological Analysis Provide New Insights into the Mechanism of Prostrate/Erect Growth Habits in the Wheat Overwintering Period.

Journal of agricultural and food chemistry·2025
Same journal

FIGLA Novel Variant c.385-9G>A Affects RNA Splicing in a Minigene Assay.

Annals of human genetics·2026
Same journal

Epigenetic Shifts in MTNR1A, MTNR1B and Fn14 and Their Links to Preeclampsia Risk.

Annals of human genetics·2026
Same journal

Hip Bone Marrow Adiposity as a Risk Factor for Alzheimer's Disease: Insights From Mendelian Randomization Analysis.

Annals of human genetics·2026
Same journal

A Novel Biallelic REL Frameshift Variant p.(Tyr9Ilefs*2) Causing Immunodeficiency-92 With Profound c-Rel Deficiency.

Annals of human genetics·2026
Same journal

Identification of PSMA4 as a Therapeutic Target for Atherosclerosis: A Comprehensive Multiomics Mendelian Randomization Analysis.

Annals of human genetics·2026
Same journal

Genetic Insights Into Hypertension and Breast Cancer Risk in African Women: A Mendelian Randomization and Colocalization Analyses.

Annals of human genetics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.4K

On Sample Size and Power Calculation for Variant Set-Based Association Tests.

Baolin Wu1, James S Pankow2

  • 1Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Annals of Human Genetics
|February 3, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Accurate sample size and power calculations are crucial for sequence-based association studies. New methods offer faster, more precise power computation for the Sequence Kernel Association Test (SKAT) without intensive simulations.

Keywords:
Sample sizesequence kernel association testsequencing study

More Related Videos

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.6K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
07:15

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation

Published on: January 16, 2019

11.4K
Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing
10:36

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

12.6K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Genetics and Genomics
  • Statistical Genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Sample size and power calculations are critical for designing robust sequence-based association studies.
  • Current methods, like SEQPower and SPS, rely on computationally intensive Monte Carlo simulations for power estimation.
  • Existing analytical approaches for SKAT power may overestimate results, particularly at small significance levels relevant for large-scale sequencing projects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop computationally efficient and accurate methods for sample size and power calculations in sequence-based association studies.
  • To address the limitations of existing analytical methods for SKAT power estimation.
  • To provide reliable tools for planning large-scale whole genome and exome sequencing projects.

Main Methods:

  • Proposed a novel chi-squared (χ(2)) approximation-based approach for efficient and accurate power computation.
  • Developed and implemented a more accurate "exact" method for power calculation, offering improved precision over Monte Carlo simulations.
  • Validated the proposed methods against existing approaches and Monte Carlo simulations.

Main Results:

  • The proposed chi-squared approximation method provides accurate and efficient power calculations.
  • The "exact" method delivers highly accurate power estimates and can serve as a benchmark for other approximation techniques.
  • Both new methods are more efficient than traditional Monte Carlo simulations for power estimation.

Conclusions:

  • The developed chi-squared approximation and "exact" methods offer significant improvements in accuracy and efficiency for SKAT power calculations.
  • These methods are crucial for optimizing the design of sequence-based association studies, especially for whole genome and exome sequencing.
  • Publicly available R programs implementing these methods facilitate their adoption in genetic research planning.