Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sampling Methods: Sample Types01:18

Sampling Methods: Sample Types

3.6K
Sampling materials are classified into three main types: solid, liquid, and gas.
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...
3.6K
Filtration00:53

Filtration

5.8K
Filtration is a physical separation process that involves passing a suspension through a porous medium to separate solids from fluids. During filtration, solids collect on the porous medium while liquids, also collectively known as the filtrate, pass through. The filtration medium is selected based on the filtration purpose, quantity, and nature of the precipitate. The general criteria for a suitable filtering medium are that it is inert, mechanically strong, nonabsorbent toward dissolved...
5.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Serum PFAS concentrations and circulating vitamin D in U.S. children: evidence of a paradox.

Pediatric research·2026
Same author

The basis for recommending the selection of samplers in determining occupational exposures to aerosols.

Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene·2026
Same author

The associations between per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure and low body height and weight of US children-a revisitation of 2013-2014 NHANES biospecimen data.

Environmental science and pollution research international·2026
Same author

Enhancing detection of asbestiform minerals in asbestos contaminated talc using FTIR and multivariate data analysis.

Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene·2026
Same author

Ensuring Quality in Interventional Cytopathology.

Acta cytologica·2025
Same author

Recommended flow rate of the aluminum cyclone for improved exposure assessment.

Annals of work exposures and health·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Collection and Extraction of Occupational Air Samples for Analysis of Fungal DNA
12:02

Collection and Extraction of Occupational Air Samples for Analysis of Fungal DNA

Published on: May 2, 2018

13.2K

Air sampling filtration media: Collection efficiency for respirable size-selective sampling.

Jhy-Charm Soo1, Keenan Monaghan1, Taekhee Lee1

  • 1Health Effects Laboratory Division, Exposure Assessment Branch, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.

Aerosol Science and Technology : the Journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research
|February 3, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Mixed cellulose ester, polytetrafluoroethylene, and polyvinyl chloride filters show high collection efficiency for ultrafine particles. These filters are more effective than polycarbonate and silver membrane filters, especially for larger pore sizes.

More Related Videos

Air Filter Devices Including Nonwoven Meshes of Electrospun Recombinant Spider Silk Proteins
09:51

Air Filter Devices Including Nonwoven Meshes of Electrospun Recombinant Spider Silk Proteins

Published on: May 8, 2013

16.6K
Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
05:45

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions

Published on: January 7, 2019

12.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Collection and Extraction of Occupational Air Samples for Analysis of Fungal DNA
12:02

Collection and Extraction of Occupational Air Samples for Analysis of Fungal DNA

Published on: May 2, 2018

13.2K
Air Filter Devices Including Nonwoven Meshes of Electrospun Recombinant Spider Silk Proteins
09:51

Air Filter Devices Including Nonwoven Meshes of Electrospun Recombinant Spider Silk Proteins

Published on: May 8, 2013

16.6K
Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
05:45

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions

Published on: January 7, 2019

12.5K

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Materials Science

Background:

  • Accurate measurement of ultrafine particles (UFPs) is crucial for environmental and health studies.
  • Various membrane air sampling filters are used, but their collection efficiencies for UFPs are not well-characterized.
  • Understanding filter performance is essential for reliable air quality monitoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and compare the collection efficiencies of commonly used membrane air sampling filters for ultrafine particles.
  • To evaluate the influence of pore size, airflow, and filter material on collection efficiency.
  • To identify optimal filter types for ultrafine particle sampling.

Main Methods:

  • Tested five filter types: Mixed Cellulose Ester (MCE), Polycarbonate, Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC), and Silver Membrane, with various pore sizes.
  • Exposed filters to polydisperse sodium chloride (NaCl) particles (10-400 nm) under controlled conditions.
  • Measured particle size distributions upstream and downstream of filters using a Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS) at flow rates of 1.7-11.2 L min⁻¹.

Main Results:

  • Collection efficiency varied with airflow, pore size, and sampling duration.
  • Higher collection efficiency and pressure drop were observed with smaller pore sizes and increased flow rates.
  • MCE, PTFE, and PVC filters demonstrated higher collection efficiencies for particles smaller than their nominal pore size compared to polycarbonate and silver membrane filters.

Conclusions:

  • Mixed Cellulose Ester (MCE), Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), and Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) filters are highly effective for sampling ultrafine particles.
  • Polycarbonate and silver membrane filters showed lower efficiencies, particularly with larger pore sizes.
  • Filter selection significantly impacts the accuracy of ultrafine particle measurements.