Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Sex Differences in Utilisation and Response to Implantable Device Therapy
Deepika Narasimha1, Anne B Curtis1
1Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, US.
Insights
Women receive fewer life-saving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) despite proven benefits. Addressing this gender gap in device therapy and clinical trials is crucial for equitable patient care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) offer significant survival benefits.
- Despite proven efficacy, women are less likely to receive ICDs and CRT.
- Women are under-represented in clinical trials for cardiac devices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review data on sex differences in clinical outcomes with ICDs and CRT.
- To explore reasons for the observed gender disparity in cardiac device therapy.
- To highlight the need for equitable access and inclusion in research.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing studies on ICD and CRT outcomes stratified by sex.
- Analysis of factors contributing to gender disparities in device implantation.
- Examination of clinical trial data regarding female participation.
Main Results:
- Evidence shows comparable benefits of ICDs and CRT for both men and women.
- Significant under-representation of female patients in cardiac device trials persists.
- Performance improvement programs demonstrate potential to reduce gender disparities.
Conclusions:
- Gender disparities in receiving life-saving ICD and CRT therapies exist.
- Increased enrollment of women in clinical trials is essential.
- Sex-specific analyses in medical device studies should be encouraged for better understanding and outcomes.
Abstract:
Multiple studies have demonstrated that implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) and cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) provide significant mortality and morbidity benefits to eligible patients irrespective of gender. However, female patients are less likely to receive this life-saving therapy and are significantly under-represented in cardiac device trials. Various performance improvement programmes have proved that this gender disparity can be reduced and these therapies should be offered to all eligible patients regardless of sex. Efforts should be made to enrol more women in clinical trials and sex-specific analysis in medical device clinical studies should be encouraged. In this article we review the data on sex differences in clinical outcomes with ICDs and CRT and explore the reasons for this sex-based disparity.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
06:10Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies