Meta-analysis of Ivabradine in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease With and Without Left Ventricular
Carolyn Cammarano1, Matthew Silva1, Morgan Comee1
1Department of Pharmacy Practice, MCPHS University, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Insights
Ivabradine did not reduce mortality or heart failure hospitalizations in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. The drug increased risks of atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, and visual disturbances, questioning its unselective use.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Ivabradine, an If-channel antagonist, targets heart rate control.
- It's considered for patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) intolerant to beta-blockers or with heart rates above 70 bpm.
- Previous trials focused on specific LVD subgroups within stable coronary artery disease (CAD).
Purpose of the Study:
- To pool data from all available ivabradine studies in stable CAD patients.
- To compare cardiovascular and safety outcomes of ivabradine use.
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ivabradine beyond its approved indications.
Main Methods:
- Review of three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.
- Inclusion of 36,524 patients with stable CAD, with or without LVD.
- Meta-analysis using Mantel-Haenszel random effects model to determine odds ratios.
Main Results:
- Ivabradine did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, or heart failure hospitalizations.
- No increase in serious adverse drug reactions or cardiac disorders was observed.
- Significant increases in new-onset atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, phosphenes, and blurry vision were noted.
Conclusions:
- The unselective use of ivabradine in stable CAD patients is not supported by current evidence.
- Potential risks include new-onset atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, and bothersome visual side effects.
- Further research may be needed to identify specific patient subgroups who could benefit.
Purpose:
Ivabradine is a novel If-channel antagonist that controls heart rate and may be helpful in treating patients with left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) who are unable to tolerate β-blockers or achieve a heart rate of 70 beats/min with standard therapy. Three landmark trials were used for the approval of ivabradine in the United States. These trials tested ivabradine in addition to a standard of care (including β-blockers) in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and found modest benefit in those with established LVD unable to tolerate β-blockers. The goal of this review was to pool data from ivabradine studies in all patients with stable CAD to compare cardiovascular and safety-related outcomes.
Methods:
Three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of ivabradine added to standard treatment (including β-blockers) in patients with stable CAD with and without LVD were reviewed for effects on mortality, cardiovascular outcomes, and adverse events. Data were independently abstracted by 2 reviewers; the Oxford quality scoring system was used to evaluate randomization, blinding, withdrawals, and dropouts; and a Mantel-Haenszel random effects pairwise meta-analysis was used to combine data into odds ratios.
Findings:
The initial search identified 116 trials; 3 of these trials, representing 36,524 patients with stable CAD, met inclusion criteria. According to the pooled results, ivabradine did not consistently reduce all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.00 [95% CI, 0.91-1.11]; P = 0.98], cardiovascular death (OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.91-1.15]; P = 0.74), or hospitalization for worsening or new onset heart-failure in patients with stable CAD (OR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.71-1.25]; P = 0.69). Ivabradine did not increase serious adverse drug reactions (OR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.88-1.13]; P = 0.93) or cardiac disorders (OR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.87-1.22]; P = 0.74). However, it was associated with drug-specific effects, including new-onset atrial fibrillation (OR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.19-1.53]; P < 0.001], bradycardia (OR, 6.54 [95% CI, 3.30-12.9]; P < 0.001), phosphenes (OR, 7.77 [95% CI, 4.12-14.63]; P < 0.001), and blurry vision (OR, 3.07 [95% CI, 2.18-4.32]; P < 0.001).
Implications:
Unselective use of ivabradine in patients with stable CAD is not supported by evidence and can be associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, and drug-related nuisance adverse events.
More Related Videos
08:10Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
10:17Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
