Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026
Author Spotlight: Unveiling Prognostic Indicators in Heart Failure - The Role of Phase Angle and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis
Published on: June 30, 2023
Phase angle and its determinants in healthy subjects: influence of body composition
Maria Cristina Gonzalez1, Thiago G Barbosa-Silva2, Renata M Bielemann2
1Post-graduation Program on Health and Behavior, Catholic University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil; cristinagbs@hotmail.com.
Background:
The phase angle (PA) has been used as a prognostic marker in several clinical situations. Nevertheless, its biological meaning is not completely understood.
Objective:
We verified how body-composition components could explain the PA.
Design:
The trial was a cross-sectional study involving 1442 participants (women: 58.5%; Caucasian: 40.2%) from body-composition studies. Labeled tritium dilution and total-body potassium were used to estimate total-body water (TBW) and intracellular water (ICW), respectively. Extracellular water (ECW) and the ECW:ICW ratio were estimated from the difference and the ratio of these values. Fat-free mass (FFM) and fat mass (FM) were estimated with the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, underwater weighing (UWW), and TBW. The PA was estimated with the use of a single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis system. Correlations between the PA and all body-composition variables were evaluated. A multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to adjust for the effects of body-composition variables on the PA variability. All analyses were performed separately by sex.
Results:
Compared with men, women exhibited significantly larger ECW:ICW ratios and FM. The highest positive correlation was shown between the PA and FFM obtained with the use of UWW (both sexes). The highest negative correlation was shown between the PA and ECW:ICW ratios for both sexes. Age, race, height, ECW:ICW, and FFM from UWW were significant PA determinants in a multivariate linear regression model. Even after adjustment for all significant covariates, the explained PA variance was low (adjusted R(2) = 0.539 and 0.421 in men and women, respectively). The greatest impact on the total PA prediction in both men and women were age, FFM, and height.
Conclusions:
Age is the most significant PA predictor in men and women followed by FFM and height. The ECW:ICW contribution may explain the association of the PA observed in the clinical setting and in people who are obese.
More Related Videos
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
10:07Measurement of Dynamic Scapular Kinematics Using an Acromion Marker Cluster to Minimize Skin Movement Artifact
Published on: February 10, 2015
Related Concept Videos
01:15Unsymmetric Bending - Angle of Neutral Axis
When a bending moment is applied at an angle θ concerning the vertical axis of a symmetrical member, it can be resolved into components along the member's principal...
01:13Phasor Arithmetics
When the derivative of a sinusoid is taken in the time domain, it transforms into its corresponding phasor multiplied by j-omega (jω) in the phasor domain, where j is the imaginary unit, and ω is the angular...
01:20Two-Dimensional Force System
01:11Power Factor
01:12Phasors
One of the significant benefits of using phasors is that they simplify the analysis of AC circuits by eliminating the time dependence of the current and voltage. This transformation...