Evaluation of a commercial MRI Linac based Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm with GEANT4
Syed Bilal Ahmad1, Arman Sarfehnia2, Moti Raj Paudel3
1Sunnybrook Research Institute, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Odette Cancer Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
Medical Physics
|February 5, 2016
Summary
The GPUMCD algorithm accurately calculates radiation dose compared to GEANT4, even with a 1.5 T magnetic field. This magnetic field significantly impacts dose at material interfaces, altering it based on material density.
Area of Science:
- Medical Physics
- Radiation Oncology
- Computational Dosimetry
Background:
- Accurate dose calculation is crucial for radiation therapy planning.
- Monte Carlo (MC) methods are advanced tools for simulating radiation transport and dose deposition.
- The integration of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with linear accelerators (LINACs) presents new challenges for dose calculation algorithms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the accuracy of the GPUMCD (GPU Monte Carlo Dose) algorithm against GEANT4 for dose calculation.
- To evaluate the dosimetric impact of a 1.5 T external magnetic field on dose calculations.
- To assess the performance of GPUMCD for use in MRI-Linac treatment planning.
Main Methods:
- A standalone GPUMCD algorithm was compared with GEANT4 (v10.1).
- Simulations were performed in water, ICRU lung, and compact-bone phantoms, with and without a 1.5 T magnetic field.
- Dose calculations used 2 MeV photons and a 7 MV spectrum, with field sizes from 1.5x1.5 to 10x10 cm², scored in 1 mm³ voxels.
Main Results:
- GPUMCD showed excellent agreement with GEANT4, with dose differences <1% in water and <±2% in heterogeneous phantoms.
- Over 99% of voxels passed volumetric gamma analysis criteria (2%-2 mm).
- The 1.5 T magnetic field caused significant dose alterations at material interfaces, varying with material density and field size (e.g., up to 47.83% dose increase at water-lung interface for 5x5 cm²).
Conclusions:
- The GPUMCD algorithm demonstrates high accuracy comparable to GEANT4, even under a 1.5 T magnetic field.
- The presence of a 1.5 T magnetic field substantially modifies dose distributions at tissue interfaces.
- GPUMCD is suitable for dose modeling in MRI-Linac systems, but interface effects due to magnetic fields must be considered.


