Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

12:39
A Methodology for Capturing Joint Visual Attention Using Mobile Eye-Trackers
Published on: January 18, 2020
8.3K
Surpassing Humans and Computers with JellyBean: Crowd-Vision-Hybrid Counting Algorithms
Akash Das Sarma1, Ayush Jain2, Arnab Nandi3
1Stanford University.
Summary
The JellyBean algorithm efficiently counts objects in images by combining human crowdsourcing and computer vision. This novel approach improves accuracy and reduces costs for object counting tasks.
Area of Science:
- Computer Vision
- Human-Computer Interaction
- Image Processing
Background:
- Object counting is crucial for various applications but faces challenges with traditional methods.
- Supervised computer vision requires extensive labeled data and struggles with complex images.
- Crowdsourcing alone can be inaccurate, especially for images with numerous objects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a cost-effective and accurate object counting algorithm.
- To combine the strengths of crowdsourcing and computer vision for improved performance.
- To introduce the JellyBean suite of algorithms for robust object counting.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing a judicious decomposition of images to enhance counting accuracy.
- Developing algorithms that are theoretically optimal or near-optimal in human query efficiency.
- Implementing both stand-alone and hybrid modes for flexibility with computer vision integration.
Main Results:
- Achieving high accuracy in object counting, even on challenging images.
- Demonstrating cost-effectiveness compared to existing methods.
- Validating the theoretical optimality and practical performance of the algorithms.
Conclusions:
- The JellyBean suite offers a superior solution for object counting by integrating crowds and computer vision.
- The hybrid approach provides flexibility and enhanced accuracy.
- This method significantly outperforms individual workers or computer vision algorithms in complex scenarios.
Related Concept Videos
Cluster Sampling Method
15.5K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
15.5K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
8.9K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.9K

