Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

7.3K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
7.3K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

12.7K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.7K
Conditions on Early Earth02:06

Conditions on Early Earth

103.2K
Around 4 billion years ago, oceans began to condense on earth while volcanic eruptions released nitrogen, carbon dioxide, methane, ammonia, and hydrogen into the primordial atmosphere. However, organisms with the characteristics of life were not initially present on earth. Scientists have used experimentation to determine how organisms evolved that could grow, reproduce, and maintain an internal environment.
103.2K
Conditions on Early Earth02:06

Conditions on Early Earth

2.9K
2.9K
Counterfactual Thinking01:19

Counterfactual Thinking

346
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in...
346
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

4.5K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
4.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Extreme-value signal detection theory for recognition memory: The parametric road not taken.

Psychological review·2026
Same author

Causal Markov violations and hidden mechanisms.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

The disputed role of knowledge in truth illusions: A critical test based on comparative judgments.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Examining the signal-detection account of visual working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Cognitive processes underlying the repetition-based truth effect: A diffusion model study.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

All types of recognition errors are (at least partly) attributable to misleading memory evidence, even false alarms.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.1K

The relevance effect and conditionals.

Niels Skovgaard-Olsen1, Henrik Singmann2, Karl Christoph Klauer3

  • 1Department of Philosophy, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany; Institut für Psychologie, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Cognition
|February 6, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The probability of "if A, then C" is not always equal to P(C|A). Relevance significantly impacts conditional judgments, supporting the Default and Penalty Hypothesis and offering new insights into how people evaluate "even if" statements.

Keywords:
Concessive conditionalsIndicative conditionalsReasonsRelevanceThe EquationThe New Paradigm

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.6K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
06:08

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

1.1K
Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
07:36

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

16.6K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology
  • Linguistics

Background:

  • The established "Equation" posits P(if A, then C) = P(C|A), supported by over a decade of research.
  • This model is criticized for oversimplification, particularly its failure to incorporate the concept of relevance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the moderating role of relevance in the evaluation of indicative conditionals.
  • To test the proposed Default and Penalty Hypothesis.
  • To compare the explanatory power of the Equation for indicative versus concessive conditionals under varying relevance conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental manipulation of relevance in the assessment of conditional statements.
  • Evaluation of the probability and acceptability of indicative and concessive conditionals.
  • Statistical analysis to determine the influence of relevance on conditional judgments.

Main Results:

  • Relevance was found to significantly moderate the relationship between P(C|A) and the evaluation of indicative conditionals.
  • The findings provide empirical support for the Default and Penalty Hypothesis.
  • The "Equation" (P(if A, then C) = P(C|A)) better accounts for concessive conditionals than indicative conditionals, especially when relevance is manipulated.

Conclusions:

  • The "Equation" is an oversimplified model of conditional reasoning, as it neglects the crucial factor of relevance.
  • The Default and Penalty Hypothesis offers a more nuanced explanation for how relevance influences judgments about conditionals.
  • Understanding the role of relevance is key to accurately modeling human reasoning with both indicative and concessive conditionals.