Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Attribution01:26

Attribution

387
In social interactions, individuals frequently seek to understand the motivations and causes behind others' behaviors. This fundamental aspect of social perception, known as attribution, plays a crucial role in shaping interpersonal relationships and guiding future actions. Attribution refers to the cognitive process through which people infer the reasons behind others' behaviors, allowing them to assess character traits, intentions, and situational influences.Attribution Theory and Its...
387
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

14.0K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
14.0K
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

877
Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus:...
877
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory01:15

Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory

846
Correspondent inference theory, proposed by Jones and Davis in 1965, seeks to explain how individuals infer stable personality traits from observed behaviors. It suggests that people attribute actions to underlying dispositions rather than external circumstances, particularly when the behavior appears intentional and socially significant.Voluntary Behavior and Dispositional AttributionAccording to this theory, individuals are more likely to attribute behavior to personal traits when it appears...
846
Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback01:24

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback

211
Self-esteem is intricately tied to our perception of competence and our ability to exert control over our lives. One of the primary sources of this perception is performance feedback — the ongoing evaluation of our actions in terms of success and failure. According to Franks and Marolla (1976), people derive self-worth from experiencing themselves as causal agents, capable of achieving goals and overcoming obstacles. This process nurtures a critical component of self-esteem:...
211
Attribution Theory00:56

Attribution Theory

14.0K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
14.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Editorial: Social influences on ontogenetic development.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Self-allocation bias in performance-based cooperative decisions is driven by self-interest rather than distorted performance encoding.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Shared effects of one's own and others' experiences during reinforcement learning on episodic memory.

NPJ science of learning·2026
Same author

Estimating and learning personality traits of and from women with borderline personality disorder.

Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation·2026
Same author

Initial Expectations and Confidence Affect the Formation of Novel Self-Beliefs and Their Revision.

Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science·2025
Same author

How the self-concept structures social role learning: insights from computational models.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 26, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.3K

Performance Feedback Processing Is Positively Biased As Predicted by Attribution Theory.

Christoph W Korn1,2,3, Gabriela Rosenblau1,4, Julia M Rodriguez Buritica1,5

  • 1Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Plos One
|February 6, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Individuals show a positivity bias, attributing good performance internally and bad performance externally. This study demonstrates this attribution bias in a novel decision-making task, confirming its relevance for feedback processing.

More Related Videos

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback
06:31

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback

Published on: June 19, 2016

8.3K
Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 26, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.3K
Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback
06:31

Force and Position Control in Humans - The Role of Augmented Feedback

Published on: June 19, 2016

8.3K
Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Background:

  • Healthy individuals exhibit a positivity bias in attribution theory, internally attributing positive feedback and externally attributing negative feedback.
  • Previous studies on this bias have methodological limitations, including direct judgment of causes, imagined events, and post-feedback assessments, questioning generalizability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish the relevance of attributions for decision-making by demonstrating an attribution-related positivity bias in a novel decision-making task.
  • To investigate how participants alter their evaluations in response to positive and negative performance feedback in a controlled setting.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel task involving rating actors' emotional expressions' credibility before and after an emotion recognition task with performance feedback.
  • Utilized a control condition without feedback to isolate the effect of performance feedback from performance itself.
  • Assessed participants' attribution style using a standard measure to link behavior to attributional tendencies.

Main Results:

  • Participants adjusted their credibility ratings towards the positive after positive feedback and towards the negative after negative feedback, aligning with attribution theory predictions.
  • A control group confirmed that performance feedback, not just performance accuracy, drove the observed positivity bias.
  • Behavior in the task correlated with established measures of attribution style.

Conclusions:

  • Positive and negative performance feedback significantly influences the evaluation of task-related stimuli, as predicted by attribution theory.
  • The study highlights the importance of attribution theory in understanding feedback processing within decision-making.
  • Findings offer a new perspective on decision-making biases related to performance feedback.