Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
Scenario drafting for early technology assessment of next generation sequencing in clinical oncology
S E P Joosten1, V P Retèl2, V M H Coupé1
1Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Centre Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Background:
Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) is expected to lift molecular diagnostics in clinical oncology to the next level. It enables simultaneous identification of mutations in a patient tumor, after which targeted therapy may be assigned. This approach could improve patient survival and/or assist in controlling healthcare costs by offering expensive treatment to only those likely to benefit. However, NGS has yet to make its way into the clinic. Health Technology Assessment can support the adoption and implementation of a novel technology, but at this early stage many of the required variables are still unknown.
Methods:
Scenario drafting and expert elicitation via a questionnaire were used to identify factors that may act as a barrier or facilitate adoption of NGS-based molecular diagnostics. Attention was paid to predominantly elicit quantitative answers, allowing their use in future modelling of cost-effectiveness.
Results:
Adequately informing patients and physicians, the latters' opinion on clinical utility and underlying evidence as well as presenting sequencing results within a relevant timeframe may act as pivotal facilitators. Reimbursement for NGS-based testing and accompanying therapies (both general and in case of off-label prescription) was found to be a potential barrier. Competition on the market and demonstrating clinical utility may also be challenging. Importantly, numerous quantitative values for variables related to each of these potential barriers/facilitators, such as such as desired panel characteristics, willingness to pay or the expected number of targets identified per person, were also elicited.
Conclusions:
We have identified several factors that may either pose a barrier or facilitate the adoption of NGS in the clinic. We believe acting upon these findings, for instance by organizing educational events, advocating new ways of evidence generation and steering towards the most cost-effective solution, will accelerate the route from bench-to-bedside. Moreover, due to the methodology of expert elicitation, this study provides parameters that can be incorporated in future cost-effectiveness modeling to steer the development of NGS gene panels towards the most optimal direction.
Insights
Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in clinical oncology faces adoption barriers like reimbursement and market competition. Addressing factors such as physician education and timely results can accelerate its integration into patient care.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Diagnostics
- Health Technology Assessment
Background:
- Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) offers potential for personalized cancer therapy by identifying tumor mutations.
- Despite its promise, NGS adoption in clinical settings is hindered by unknown variables and lack of established protocols.
- Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is crucial for evaluating novel technologies like NGS but requires robust data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify key factors facilitating or hindering the clinical adoption of NGS-based molecular diagnostics.
- To gather quantitative data for future cost-effectiveness modeling of NGS implementation.
- To inform strategies for accelerating the bench-to-bedside translation of NGS technology.
Main Methods:
- Utilized scenario drafting and expert elicitation through questionnaires.
- Focused on obtaining predominantly quantitative answers from experts.
- Aimed to identify both barriers and facilitators for NGS adoption.
Main Results:
- Key facilitators include adequate patient/physician education, physician perception of clinical utility, and timely result delivery.
- Potential barriers identified are reimbursement for testing/therapies and market competition.
- Quantitative data on desired panel characteristics, willingness to pay, and expected targets per patient were elicited.
Conclusions:
- Acting on identified facilitators (e.g., education, evidence generation) can accelerate NGS clinical adoption.
- Addressing barriers such as reimbursement and demonstrating clinical utility is essential.
- Expert elicitation provides crucial parameters for cost-effectiveness modeling to guide NGS panel development.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Next-generation Sequencing
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....
Sanger Sequencing
Maxam-Gilbert Sequencing
Challenges of the Maxam-Gilbert Method
The...

