Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026
Impression Cytology of the Lid Wiper Area
Published on: August 9, 2016
Assessment of conjunctival goblet cell density using laser scanning confocal microscopy versus impression cytology
Luisa H Colorado1, Yahya Alzahrani1, Nicola Pritchard1
1Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, and School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Purpose:
To determine the association between conjunctival goblet cell density (GCD) assessed using in vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy and conjunctival impression cytology in a healthy population.
Methods:
Ninety (90) healthy participants undertook a validated 5-item dry eye questionnaire, non-invasive tear film break-up time measurement, ocular surface fluorescein staining and phenol red thread test. These tests where undertaken to diagnose and exclude participants with dry eye. The nasal bulbar conjunctiva was imaged using laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM). Conjunctival impression cytology (CIC) was performed in the same region a few minutes later. Conjunctival goblet cell density was calculated as cells/mm(2).
Results:
There was a strong positive correlation of conjunctival GCD between LSCM and CIC (ρ=0.66). Conjunctival goblet cell density was 475±41 cells/mm(2) and 466±51 cells/mm(2) measured by LSCM and CIC, respectively.
Conclusions:
The strong association between in vivo and in vitro cellular analysis for measuring conjunctival GCD suggests that the more invasive CIC can be replaced by the less invasive LSCM in research and clinical practice.
