Justification for a 2D versus 3D fingertip finite element model during static contact simulations
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Finite Element Modeling for the Simulation of the Quasi-Static Compression of Corrugated Tapered Tubes
Published on: January 6, 2023
Gregor Harih1, Mitsunori Tada2, Bojan Dolšak1
1a Laboratory for Intelligent CAD Systems, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering , University of Maribor , Maribor , Slovenia.
Abstract:
The biomechanical response of a human hand during contact with various products has not been investigated in details yet. It has been shown that excessive contact pressure on the soft tissue can result in discomfort, pain and also cumulative traumatic disorders. This manuscript explores the benefits and limitations of a simplified two-dimensional vs. an anatomically correct three-dimensional finite element model of a human fingertip. Most authors still use 2D FE fingertip models due to their simplicity and reduced computational costs. However we show that an anatomically correct 3D FE fingertip model can provide additional insight into the biomechanical behaviour. The use of 2D fingertip FE models is justified when observing peak contact pressure values as well as displacement during the contact for the given studied cross-section. On the other hand, an anatomically correct 3D FE fingertip model provides a contact pressure distribution, which reflects the fingertip's anatomy.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Three-Dimensional Force System
Static and Kinetic Frictional Force
However, if two systems are in contact and are stationary relative to one...
Three-Dimensional Force System:Problem Solving
To solve a three-dimensional force system, first resolve each force into its respective scalar components. Do this using...
Two-Dimensional Force System

