Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Reducing clinical trial risk in multiple sclerosis
C D De Gasperis-Brigante1, J L Parker1, P W O'Connor2
1Department of Biology, University of Toronto at Mississauga, University of Toronto, 3359 Mississauga Road, Mississauga, ON, Canada L5L 1C6.
Objective:
To determine the risk of clinical trial failure for new drugs in multiple sclerosis (MS) and to identify factors that could improve outcomes.
Methods:
We collected data on compounds that were tested in MS from Phase I to Phase III clinical trials between 1998 and January 2015. Clinical trials success rates were calculated and compared to industry standards. The exclusion criteria for the drugs in this study were: drugs that commenced Phase I in MS prior to 1998, non-industry conducted trials, trials testing non-disease modifying drug treatment, and trials testing combinations of drugs already approved by the FDA.
Results:
Fifty-three distinct drugs met our inclusion criteria. The cumulative success rate for MS drugs was 27%, almost triple the 10% industry rate. Clinical trial success rates in MS surpass that of industry across all phases. Phase II clinical trials completed in a "Relapsing MS" population were most successful in predicting Phase III clinical trial success. Small molecules were found to have a higher overall success rate compared to biologics; however, both drug technologies largely pursue different molecular targets. Drugs that were previously FDA approved for another indication and were subsequently tested in MS had lower success rates than drugs that had no previous FDA approval history.
Conclusions:
Overall, MS enjoys almost triple the clinical trial success rates of other disease areas. In addition, small molecules are superior to biologics in MS and novel drugs are superior to drugs with a previous FDA approval history outside MS.
More Related Videos
10:46A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
09:38Determining Immune System Suppression versus CNS Protection for Pharmacological Interventions in Autoimmune Demyelination
Published on: September 12, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Blinding
Bioavailability Study Design: Single Versus Multiple Dose Studies