Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Performance of 2014 NICE defibrillator implantation guidelines in heart failure risk stratification
Richard M Cubbon1, Klaus K Witte1, Lorraine C Kearney1
1Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, The University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Insights
The updated National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines (TA314) identify patients at higher risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD) and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock. However, clinical context and absolute risk are crucial for treatment decisions.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Public Health Policy
Background:
- The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) Technology Appraisal 314 (TA314) provides updated guidance on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) use in chronic heart failure.
- Assessing the real-world performance of these guidelines is crucial for optimizing patient selection and resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of TA314 in identifying patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) or appropriate ICD shock.
- To compare the risk profiles of patients meeting and not meeting TA314 criteria, considering comorbidities like diabetes and cardiomyopathy type.
Main Methods:
- A multicentre prospective cohort study involving 1026 patients with stable chronic heart failure (LVEF ≤45%) recruited from UK cardiology outpatient departments.
- Analysis focused on the capacity of TA314 criteria to predict SCD, appropriate ICD shock, and mortality from cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes.
Main Results:
- The overall incidence of SCD or appropriate ICD shock was 2.1 events per 100 patient-years.
- Patients meeting TA314 criteria had a 2.5-fold increased relative risk of SCD or appropriate ICD shock.
- Patients with diabetes or ischaemic cardiomyopathy not meeting TA314 criteria showed risks comparable to those meeting criteria but without these specific conditions.
Conclusions:
- TA314 effectively identifies patients with reduced LVEF at increased relative risk for SCD.
- Clinicians must integrate the absolute risk of SCD and individual patient context into discussions regarding ICD therapy benefits and risks.
Objective:
Define the real-world performance of recently updated National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines (TA314) on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) use in people with chronic heart failure.
Methods:
Multicentre prospective cohort study of 1026 patients with stable chronic heart failure, associated with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤45% recruited in cardiology outpatient departments of four UK hospitals. We assessed the capacity of TA314 to identify patients at increased risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) or appropriate ICD shock.
Results:
The overall risk of SCD or appropriate ICD shock was 2.1 events per 100 patient-years (95% CI 1.7 to 2.6). Patients meeting TA314 ICD criteria (31.1%) were 2.5-fold (95% CI 1.6 to 3.9) more likely to suffer SCD or appropriate ICD shock; they were also 1.5-fold (95% CI 1.1 to 2.2) more likely to die from non-cardiovascular causes and 1.6-fold (95% CI 1.1 to 2.3) more likely to die from progressive heart failure. Patients with diabetes not meeting TA314 criteria experienced comparable absolute risk of SCD or appropriate ICD shock to patients without diabetes who met TA314 criteria. Patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy not meeting TA314 criteria experienced comparable absolute risk of SCD or appropriate ICD shock to patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy who met TA314 criteria.
Conclusions:
TA314 can identify patients with reduced LVEF who are at increased relative risk of sudden death. Clinicians should also consider clinical context and the absolute risk of SCD when advising patients about the potential risks and benefits of ICD therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies

