Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Modeling Encephalopathy of Prematurity Using Prenatal Hypoxia-ischemia with Intra-amniotic Lipopolysaccharide in Rats
Published on: November 20, 2015
Long-term cognitive and school outcomes of late-preterm and early-term births: a systematic review
E Chan1,2, P Leong3, R Malouf1
1National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Insights
Late-preterm (LPT) and early-term (ET) births are linked to poorer long-term cognitive and educational outcomes. These findings highlight potential risks associated with births before full term, underscoring the need for continued research.
Area of Science:
- Perinatal and Developmental Psychology
- Pediatric Neurology
- Public Health & Epidemiology
Background:
- Infants born before full term (39-41 weeks) face elevated risks for adverse cognitive development.
- Late-preterm (LPT; 34-36 weeks) and early-term (ET; 37-38 weeks) births are common, necessitating risk assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and analyze the long-term cognitive and educational outcomes of late-preterm and early-term births.
- To quantify the risks associated with LPT and ET births compared to full-term births.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of studies published between January 1975 and June 2013, using Medline and Embase databases.
- Inclusion criteria focused on studies assessing cognitive and educational outcomes at age 2 years or older.
- Meta-analysis was employed where feasible to synthesize data on general cognitive ability, IQ, school performance, and special educational needs.
Main Results:
- LPT and ET births were associated with underperformance in cognitive and educational outcomes compared to term/full-term births.
- LPT children exhibited an increased risk of lower general cognitive ability (aRR 1.38).
- Poorer outcomes persisted into adulthood, with significant performance differences observed between LPT/ET and term/full-term cohorts.
Conclusions:
- This review confirms multiple, albeit small, adverse differences in long-term cognitive outcomes for late-preterm and early-term births.
- The findings underscore the importance of considering gestational age in assessing developmental trajectories.
- Further research is warranted to explore interventions and support for children born preterm.
Background:
Children born before full term (39-41 weeks' gestation) are at increased risk of adverse cognitive outcomes. Risk quantification is important as late-preterm (LPT; 34-36 weeks) and early-term (ET; 37-38 weeks) births are common.
Method:
This review analyses the effect of LPT and ET births on long-term cognitive and educational outcomes. The primary outcome was general cognitive ability. Secondary outcomes included verbal/non-verbal intelligence quotient, subject-specific school performance and special educational needs. The search strategy included Medline and Embase from January 1975 to June 2013. Eligible studies investigated specified outcomes and included suitable gestational age participants assessed at 2 years and older. Outcome measures and socio-demographic descriptors were extracted, and data meta-analysed where possible.
Results:
Eight studies compared ET birth with full-term birth. Fourteen studies compared LPT birth with either term birth (>37 weeks, n = 12 studies) or full-term birth (39-41 weeks, n = 2 studies). Substantial between-study heterogeneity existed. LPT and ET children underperformed in most outcomes compared with their term/full-term counterparts, respectively. For example, LPT children had an increased risk of lower general cognitive ability (adjusted risk ratio 1.38 [95% confidence interval 1.06-1.79]), and full-term children performed 5% of a standard deviation higher (z-score 0.05 [0.02, 0.08]) than ET children. Poorer outcomes persist into adulthood; term cohorts performed 5% of a standard deviation higher than LPT cohorts (z-score 0.05 [0.04, 0.07]), and full-term cohorts performed 3% of a standard deviation higher than ET cohorts (z-score 0.03 [0.02, 0.04]).
Conclusion:
This review critically examines the knowledge around long-term cognitive outcomes of LPT and ET births, demonstrating multiple, small, adverse differences between LPT/ET and term/full-term births.
Related Concept Videos
Information Processing Approach
Longitudinal Studies
Regression Toward the Mean
Longitudinal Research
The Nativist Approach
Environmental Influences on Intelligence

