Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

4.2K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
4.2K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

3.8K
3.8K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

15.4K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
15.4K
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing01:23

Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing

13.0K
Focusing involves centering a conversation on a message's critical elements or concepts. Focusing is valuable if the talk is vague or patients begin to repeat themselves. Sometimes, when patients are asked about their symptoms, they may go off-topic and try to tell their entire life story. Respectfully, the nurse should bring the conversation back into focus.
This therapeutic technique can also be used when a patient brings up pertinent information during a health-related conversation. The...
13.0K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

2.7K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
2.7K
Feedback Inhibition00:46

Feedback Inhibition

58.5K
Biochemical reactions are occurring constantly in cells, converting starting substances to different products, usually with the help of enzymes that speed the reactions. Without enzymes, it would take far too long for most reactions to occur to be useful to the cell!
58.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reflections on the 2026 award-winning papers.

Medical education·2026
Same author

What counts as quality in health professions education?

Medical education·2026
Same author

With coffee and curiosity: Reflections on responsibility and renewal.

Medical education·2025
Same author

Feeling Feedback: The Role of Emotions in Feedback.

The clinical teacher·2025
Same author

A critical review of psychological safety in clinical learning environments.

Medical teacher·2025
Same author

Validity and reliability of a questionnaire that aims to investigate consumption and problematic eating behaviours towards refined sugar.

Journal of nutritional science·2025
Same journal

Development of core competency indicators for emergency medicine residents based on the competency model: a Delphi and analytic hierarchy process study.

BMC medical education·2026
Same journal

Virtual simulation as a catalyst for equitable and authentic interprofessional learning.

BMC medical education·2026
Same journal

Influencing surgical career choice among final-year medical students: a multi-center cross-sectional study in Türkiye.

BMC medical education·2026
Same journal

Construction and application of an intelligent tutoring system for resident physicians' medical record writing based on large language models.

BMC medical education·2026
Same journal

From classrooms to practice: does pre-service training for one health professions provide readiness for antimicrobial stewardship?

BMC medical education·2026
Same journal

Association between community medicine rotation duration and general medicine in-training examination scores among second-year resident physicians in Japan: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

BMC medical education·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.7K

Translating evidence-based guidelines to improve feedback practices: the interACT case study.

Karen L Barton1,2, Susie J Schofield3, Sean McAleer4

  • 1Centre for Medical Education, Medical Education Institute, University of Dundee, McKenzie Building, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee, DD2 4BF, UK. k.barton@abertay.ac.uk.

BMC Medical Education
|February 11, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The interACT project successfully re-engineered higher education assessment and feedback practices. This technology-enhanced approach improved student and staff engagement through self-evaluation and feedback dialogue.

More Related Videos

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 26, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.7K
Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.9K

Area of Science:

  • Educational Technology
  • Higher Education Pedagogy
  • Assessment and Feedback Studies

Background:

  • Higher education assessment and feedback practices show resistance to change despite extensive research.
  • The interACT (Interaction and Collaboration via Technology) project aimed to address this by re-engineering practices.
  • The project utilized evidence-based literature to guide the redesign of assessment and feedback.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a case study of a comprehensive program-wide re-engineering of assessment and feedback.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of the interACT project's approach to assessment and feedback.
  • To identify transferable principles and strategies for improving feedback practices in higher education.

Main Methods:

  • Employed action research methodology with two cycles of planning, action, evaluation, and reflection.
  • Utilized four key pedagogical principles to inform the redesign of assessment and feedback.
  • Collected data through document analysis, staff (n=10) and student (n=7) interviews, and student questionnaires (n=54).
  • Analyzed quantitative data using descriptive statistics and qualitative data using framework thematic analysis.

Main Results:

  • Students and staff reported that interACT fostered self-evaluation, feedback engagement, and dialogue.
  • Streamlining processes after the initial action research cycle was key to enhancing engagement.
  • The interACT process demonstrated clear benefits in promoting self-evaluation, feedback reflection, dialogue, and longitudinal perspectives.

Conclusions:

  • The interACT project successfully re-engineered assessment and feedback processes using educational principles and stakeholder input.
  • The developed principles and strategies for enacting them are likely transferable to other educational contexts.
  • This case study offers a model for systemic improvement in higher education feedback mechanisms.