Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026

A Novel Stretching Platform for Applications in Cell and Tissue Mechanobiology
Published on: June 3, 2014
The Mock Academic Faculty Position Competition: A Pilot Professional and Career Development Opportunity for
Rita Isabel Henderson1, Naweed Syed
1R.I. Henderson is an anthropologist and postdoctoral research fellow, Department of Community Health Sciences and Department of Family Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. N. Syed is scientific director, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute for Child and Maternal Health, director, Postdoctoral Program, Office of the Vice-President (Research), and professor, Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Problem:
Medical educators face a dilemma in countries like Canada, where policy makers and strategic planners have prioritized highly qualified personnel and expanded recruitment of advanced trainees at a time when early-career specialists face prolonged job insecurity as they transition to professional employment. The University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine hatched the Mock Academic Faculty Position competition to test the school's existing capacity to address the pressing career development needs of highly trained graduates.
Approach:
The competition was piloted in May-June 2014. Approximately 180 postdoctoral fellows were invited to compete; 34 submitted portfolios. The Postdoctoral Program Office established a longlist of 12 applicants. Through reviews, a selection committee identified 3 finalists to participate in a daylong event consisting of a research presentation and committee interview. The event was followed by approximately 70 audience members at any given time who were invited to complete anonymous evaluation forms and/or exit interviews.
Outcomes:
The selection committee deduced a vast majority of applicants did not sell their skills effectively or demonstrate research programs independent from supervisors. Exit interviews conducted with 40 audience members indicated 36 (90%) picked the same finalist as the selection committee, 34 (85%) found the process "nerve racking," and 28 (70%) had no previous idea of what goes on inside an academic committee interview.
Next Steps:
A key recommendation for future iterations is early attention to systematizing feedback to ensure more direct impact for nonfinalists. Alternative initiatives for those gearing up for industry or public-sector work are being prepared.
More Related Videos
07:16Author Spotlight: Development of a Novel Finite Element Analysis Model for Improved Orthognathic Surgical Techniques
Published on: October 20, 2023
10:17Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
Published on: November 15, 2024