Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating triphasic oral contraceptives: the rationale for a randomized trial.

D A Grimes1

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
|November 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

'Allocation concealment': the evolution and adoption of a methodological term.

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2018
Same author

Immediate start of hormonal contraceptives for contraception.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2008
Same author

Strategies for communicating contraceptive effectiveness.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2008
Same author

Skin patch and vaginal ring versus combined oral contraceptives for contraception.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2008
Same author

LRRK2 screening in a Canadian Parkinson's disease cohort.

The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques·2007
Same author

Steroid hormones for contraception in men.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2007

This study compared three low-dose multiphasic oral contraceptives, evaluating their metabolic effects and adverse drug experiences. The research aimed to provide relevant data for current low-dose oral contraceptive use.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Health
  • Clinical Pharmacology
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences

Background:

  • Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for medical research, minimizing bias.
  • Previous studies on oral contraceptives often used higher estrogen doses, which may not reflect current low-dose formulations.
  • There is a need for comparative data on the metabolic effects and adverse events of modern low-dose oral contraceptives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the metabolic effects of three multiphasic low-dose oral contraceptives.
  • To evaluate and compare adverse drug experiences associated with these oral contraceptives.
  • To provide current, relevant data on commonly used low-dose oral contraceptives in the United States.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized clinical trial was conducted.
Keywords:
AmericasBiasClinical ResearchContraceptionContraceptive MethodsDeveloped CountriesError SourcesEvaluationFamily PlanningMeasurementNorth AmericaNorthern AmericaOral ContraceptivesResearch MethodologyUnited States

Related Experiment Videos

  • Three multiphasic oral contraceptives marketed in the United States were compared.
  • The study focused on metabolic effects and adverse drug experiences.

    • Main Results:

    • The abstract does not contain specific results.
    • Further details on metabolic changes and adverse events are needed.
    • Comparative efficacy and safety data were sought.

    Conclusions:

    • The study provides a basis for comparing current low-dose oral contraceptives.
    • Findings are intended to inform clinical practice regarding oral contraceptive selection.
    • More research may be needed to fully elucidate differences between formulations.