Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 26, 2026
C-arm-Free Simultaneous OLIF51 and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation in a Single Lateral Position
Published on: September 16, 2022
Sacrum and Coccyx Radiographs Have Limited Clinical Impact in the Emergency Department
Tarek N Hanna1, Mahniya Sadiq2, Noah Ditkofsky1
11 Division of Emergency Radiology, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Midtown Hospital, 550 Peachtree Rd, Atlanta GA 30308.
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to determine the yield and clinical impact of sacrum and coccyx radiographs in the emergency department (ED).
Materials And Methods:
Consecutive sacrum and coccyx radiographs obtained in the EDs of four hospitals over a 6-year period were categorized as positive for acute fracture or dislocation, negative, or other. Five follow-up metrics were analyzed: follow-up advanced imaging in the same ED visit, follow-up advanced imaging within 30 days, new analgesic prescriptions, clinic follow-up, and surgical intervention within 60 days.
Results:
Sacrum and coccyx radiographs from 687 patients (mean age, 48.1 years; 61.6% women and 38.4% men) obtained at level-1 (n = 335) and level-2 (n = 352) trauma centers showed a positivity rate of 8.4% ± 2.1% (n = 58/687). None of the 58 positive cases had surgical intervention. At the level-1 trauma centers, there was no significant association between sacrum and coccyx radiograph positivity and analgesic prescription or clinical follow-up (p = 0.12; odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% CI, 0.81-6.20). At the level-2 trauma centers, 97.1% (n = 34/35) of patients with positive sacrum and coccyx radiographs received analgesic prescriptions or clinical referrals, whereas negative cases were at 82.9% (OR, 7.0; 95% CI, 0.94-52.50). Of all cases, 5.7% (n = 39) and 4.3% (n = 29) had advanced imaging in the same ED visit and within 30 days, respectively. Sacrum and coccyx radiography results had no significant correlation with advanced imaging in the same ED visit (level-1, p = 0.351; level-2, p = 0.179). There was no significant difference in 30-day advanced imaging at the level-1 trauma centers (p = 0.8), but there was at the level-2 trauma centers (p = 0.0493).
Conclusion:
ED sacrum and coccyx radiographs showed a low positivity rate and had no quantifiable clinical impact. We recommend that sacrum and coccyx radiographs be eliminated from ED practice and patients treated conservatively on the basis of clinical parameters.
Related Concept Videos
01:30Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
01:30Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
01:20Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
01:14Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...